“Thinking on your feet”—a qualitative study of debriefing practice
Open Access
- 1 January 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Advances in Simulation
- Vol. 1 (1), 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0011-4
Abstract
Debriefing is a significant component of simulation-based education (SBE). Regardless of how and where immersive simulation is used to support learning, debriefing has a critical role to optimise learning outcomes. Although the literature describes different debriefing methods and approaches that constitute effective debriefing, there are discrepancies as to what is actually practised and how experts or experienced debriefers perceive and approach debriefing. This study sought to explore the self-reported practices of expert debriefers. We used a qualitative approach to explore experts’ debriefing practices. Peer-nominated expert debriefers who use immersive manikin-based simulations were identified in the healthcare simulation community across Australia. Twenty-four expert debriefers were purposively sampled to participate in semi-structured telephone interviews lasting 45–90 min. Interviews were transcribed and independently analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Codes emerging through the data analysis clustered into four major categories: (1) Values: ideas and beliefs representing the fundamental principles that underpinned interviewees’ debriefing practices. (2) Artistry: debriefing practices which are dynamic and creative. (3) Techniques: the specific methods used by interviewees to promote a productive and safe learning environment. (4) Development: changes in interviewees’ debriefing practices over time. The “practice development triangle” inspired by the work of Handal and Lauvas offers a framework for our themes. A feature of the triangle is that the values of expert debriefers provide a foundation for associated artistry and techniques. This framework may provide a different emphasis for courses and programmes designed to support debriefing practices where microskill development is often privileged, especially those microskills associated with techniques (plan of action, creating a safe environment, managing learning objectives, promoting learner reflection and co-debriefing). Across the levels in the practice development triangle, the importance of continuing professional development is acknowledged. Strengths and limitations of the study are noted.Keywords
Funding Information
- Tryg Fundation (TrygFonden) (7-11-1189)
- Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine (30006)
- SkejSim (1112231324601424372)
- The Central Denmark Region Health Scientific Research Fund (1-30-72-114-10)
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Introduction to debriefingSeminars in Perinatology, 2013
- Evolution of the Pediatric Advanced Life Support coursePediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2012
- Why simulation can be efficient: on the preconditions of efficient learning in complex technology based practicesBMC Medical Education, 2009
- A tool for self-assessment of communication skills and professionalism in residentsBMC Medical Education, 2009
- Value of Debriefing during Simulated Crisis ManagementAnesthesiology, 2006
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- Learning clinical skills - the place of simulation and feedbackThe Clinical Teacher, 2005
- Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic reviewMedical Teacher, 2005
- The future vision of simulation in health careQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2004
- Whatever happened to qualitative description?Research in Nursing & Health, 2000