In What Scenarios Does a Mobile Stroke Unit Predict Better Patient Outcomes?
- 1 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Stroke
- Vol. 51 (6), 1805-1812
- https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.119.028474
Abstract
Background and Purpose— The mobile stroke unit (MSU) brings imaging and thrombolysis to patients in the field. The MSU has the potential to decrease time from onset to thrombolysis; however, this depends on the location of the patient, the MSU, and the hospital. The MSU will only be able to treat a small subset of patients it is dispatched to. Using conditional probability modeling, we evaluate in which scenarios the MSU exhibits clear benefit over the direct-to-mothership method. Methods— Previously published conditional probability models for drip-and-ship versus mothership transport were modified to reflect MSU workflow. It was assumed that the MSU was dispatched from the endovascular therapy center. Eight scenarios were generated, varying treatment efficiency on the MSU and at the endovascular therapy center and the threshold for dispatching the MSU (low threshold: low treatment rate but few missed patients; high threshold: higher treatment rate, potential for missed treatment opportunities). Results— The relative difference in outcomes between the MSU and mothership was small. Geographic areas where the MSU is superior to mothership increase in size as treatment time on the MSU decreases. When a high-threshold dispatch system is used, the area where the MSU is superior decreases, but the relative difference in predicted outcomes between the MSU and mothership increases. The largest relative difference favoring the MSU was found in areas where the patient would forgo access to alteplase, based upon a 4.5-hour treatment threshold, using mothership transport. Conclusions— There are few scenarios where MSU transport predicts substantially superior outcomes to the mothership method when the MSU is dispatched from the endovascular therapy center. Outcomes using the MSU are maximized when dispatch criteria that maximize patients eligible for thrombolysis treatment are used and treatment times on the MSU are short relative to those of the endovascular therapy center.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emergency Department Door-to-Puncture Time Since 2014Stroke, 2019
- Effects of Prehospital Thrombolysis in Stroke Patients With Prestroke DependencyStroke, 2018
- Functional outcomes of pre-hospital thrombolysis in a mobile stroke treatment unit compared with conventional care: an observational registry studyThe Lancet Neurology, 2016
- Analysis of Workflow and Time to Treatment and the Effects on Outcome in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results from the SWIFT PRIME Randomized Controlled TrialRadiology, 2016
- Implementing a Mobile Stroke Unit Program in the United StatesJAMA Neurology, 2015
- Good is not Good Enough: The Benchmark Stroke Door-to-Needle Time Should be 30 MinutesCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 2014
- Effect of the Use of Ambulance-Based Thrombolysis on Time to Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic StrokeJAMA, 2014
- Prehospital thrombolysis in acute strokeNeurology, 2013
- Diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke in a mobile stroke unit versus in hospital: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet Neurology, 2012
- Time Is Brain—QuantifiedStroke, 2006