Clinical Outcomes of the Self-Expandable Evolut R Valve Versus the Balloon-Expandable SAPIEN 3 Valve in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
- 16 October 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
- Vol. 25, 57-62
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2020.10.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the Hemodynamic Performance of the Balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 Versus Self-expandable Evolut R Transcatheter Valve: A Case-matched StudyRevista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), 2018
- Early versus newer generation devices for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in routine clinical practice: a propensity score matched analysisOpen Heart, 2018
- Contemporary transcatheter aortic valve replacement with third‐generation balloon‐expandable versus self‐expanding devicesJournal of Interventional Cardiology, 2017
- Comparison of the Edwards SAPIEN S3 Versus Medtronic Evolut-R Devices for Transcatheter Aortic Valve ImplantationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2016
- Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. The Tromsø StudyHeart, 2012
- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a self‐expanding nitinol bioprosthesisCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2012
- Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo SurgeryThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Comparison of outcome of asymptomatic to symptomatic patients older than 20 years of age with valvular aortic stenosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival.Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1982