The manipulation of affect: A meta-analysis of affect induction procedures.
- 1 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 146 (4), 355-375
- https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000224
Abstract
Affect inductions have become essential for testing theories of affect and for conducting experimental research on the effects of mood and emotion. The current review takes stock of the vast body of existing literature on affect induction procedures (AIPs; also referred to as mood inductions) to evaluate the effectiveness of affect inductions as research tools and to test theories of affect (e.g., the bipolarity hypothesis, negativity bias, positivity offset, and theories of emotionality and gender) using meta-analytic data. In doing so, we seek to address whether AIPs are effective for inducing affective states, what conditions maximize their effectiveness, for which emotions they are most effective, for whom they are most effective, and whether affect induction findings can provide insight into theories of affect. A meta-analysis of 874 samples and 53,509 participants suggests that affect inductions are effective on average (delta = 1.32), but this effectiveness varies with the type of affect induction, the emotion being induced, and the gender of the participants. Further, results indicate coupled activation where the induction of positive (negative) emotions leads to a corresponding reduction in negative (positive) emotions, which provides support for the bipolar continuum of positive and negative affect. Results also revealed a negativity bias in which individuals display stronger reactions to negative stimuli than positive stimuli. A practical guide in the choice of affect induction procedures for researchers is presented and implications for emotion theory are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of automaticity and attention in neural processes underlying empathy for happiness, sadness, and anxietyFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2013
- Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: A meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations.Psychological Bulletin, 2011
- Memory for emotional faces in naturally occurring dysphoria and induced sadnessBehaviour Research and Therapy, 2009
- In Bad Taste: Evidence for the Oral Origins of Moral DisgustScience, 2009
- Anxiety sensitivity and the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis.Psychological Bulletin, 2009
- Effects of emotionally contagious films on changes in hemisphere-specific cognitive performance.Emotion, 2009
- Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development.Psychological Bulletin, 2008
- Inducing affective states with success-failure manipulations: A meta-analysis.Emotion, 2004
- Can people feel happy and sad at the same time?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
- Mood and heuristics: The influence of happy and sad states on sensitivity and bias in stereotyping.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000