A pilot study on the effectiveness of low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (LiCBT) for common mental disorders in Hong Kong
- 13 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Vol. 49 (6), 758-763
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352465820000971
Abstract
Background: To cope with the rising demand for psychological treatment, evidence-based low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (LiCBT) delivered by trained para-professionals was introduced internationally. Aims: This pilot study aimed at examining the effectiveness of LiCBT in Hong Kong. Method: This study was of an uncontrolled pre- and post-treatment design, testing LiCBT at a local community mental health centre in Hong Kong. Two hundred and eighty-five Chinese adult help-seekers to the centre attended two or more sessions of LiCBT delivered by trained para-professionals. These participants also rated their depression and anxiety on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7), respectively, at pre- and post-treatment. Results: Comparison of the pre- and post-treatment PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores of 285 participants indicated significant improvements in depression and anxiety with large effect sizes (depression: d = 0.87; anxiety: d = 0.95). For those participants reaching the clinical level of either depression and/or anxiety at pre-treatment (n = 229, 80.4%), they reported even larger effect sizes (depression: d = 1.00; anxiety: d = 1.15). The recovery rate was 55.9% with a reliable improvement rate of 63.9%. An average of 5.6 sessions was offered to the participants with each session spanning a mean of 42 minutes. The baseline clinical conditions and participants’ educational level were predictive of post-treatment recovery. Conclusions: The results supported the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of LiCBT for depression and anxiety at a Hong Kong community mental health centre. The effect sizes and the recovery and reliable improvement rates achieved were comparable to those reported from countries such as the UK and Australia.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Australian version of IAPT: clinical outcomes of the multi-site cohort study of NewAccessJournal of Mental Health, 2023
- Realizing the Mass Public Benefit of Evidence-Based Psychological Therapies: The IAPT ProgramAnnual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2018
- Recovery and reliable change rates for patients scoring severe on depression, anxiety or impaired functioning in a psychological therapies service: IAPTMental Health Review Journal, 2015
- Service Use, Drop-Out Rate and Clinical Outcomes: A Comparison Between High and Low Intensity Treatments in an IAPT ServiceBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2014
- Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveysPsychological Medicine, 2013
- Improving access to psychological therapy: Initial evaluation of two UK demonstration sitesBehaviour Research and Therapy, 2009