Field evaluation of the performance of seven Antigen Rapid diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of SARs-CoV-2 virus infection in Uganda
Open Access
- 10 May 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 17 (5), e0265334
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265334
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of seven antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag RDTs) in a clinical setting to identify those that could be recommended for use in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Uganda. This was a cross-sectional prospective study. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected consecutively from COVID-19 PCR positive and COVID-19 PCR negative participants at isolation centers and points of entry, and tested with the SARS-CoV-2 Ag RDTs. Test sensitivity and specificity were generated by comparing results against qRT-PCR results (Berlin Protocol) at a cycle threshold (Ct) cut-off of ≤39. Sensitivity was also calculated at Ct cut-offs ≤29 and ≤33. None of the Ag RDTs had a sensitivity of ≥80% at Ct cut-off values ≤33 and ≤39. Two kits, Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag and VivaDiag™ SARS-CoV-2 Ag had a sensitivity of ≥80% at a Ct cut-off value of ≤29. Four kits: BIOCREDIT COVID -19 Ag, COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip, MEDsan® SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Test and Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test had a specificity of ≥97%. This evaluation identified one Ag RDT, Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag with a performance at high viral load (Ct value ≤29) reaching that recommended by WHO. This kit was recommended for screening of patients with COVID -19-like symptoms presenting at health facilities.Funding Information
- Uganda Government
- world health organisatio
- Africa CDC
- jack ma foundation and the uk medical research council (mrc)/uk research and innovation
- European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership
- covid-19 antigen rapid test suppliers
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- COVID-19 Response in Sub-Saharan Low-Resource Setting: Healthcare Soldiers Need BulletsThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2020
- Evaluation of a Rapid Diagnostic Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen in Nasopharyngeal SwabsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020
- Implementation of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigenic testing in a laboratory without access to molecular methods: Experiences of a general hospitalJournal of Clinical Virology, 2020
- Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosisJournal of Clinical Virology, 2020
- Viral dynamics in asymptomatic patients with COVID-19International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Development and Potential Usefulness of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip Diagnostic Assay in a Pandemic ContextFrontiers in Medicine, 2020
- Viral RNA load as determined by cell culture as a management tool for discharge of SARS-CoV-2 patients from infectious disease wardsEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCREurosurveillance, 2020
- Initial viral load of a COVID-19-infected case indicated by its cycle threshold value of polymerase chain reaction could be used as a predictor of its transmissibility - An experience from Gujarat, IndiaIndian Journal of Community Medicine, 2020
- Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methodsStatistics in Medicine, 1998