Prognostic value of the AJCC 8th edition staging system for Japanese patients treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy for breast cancer
- 30 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 25 (8), 1499-1505
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01686-x
Abstract
Background American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Breast Cancer Staging System, biological information in addition to anatomical information was added as a basis for prognosis evaluation, but its prognostic impact in Japanese patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy has not been discussed. To determine the applicability of the updated prognostic staging system, we evaluated the prognostic value and confirmed the effectiveness of this system in patients in whom postoperative radiotherapy was performed. Materials and methods Patients who were treated with postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer in our institution between January 2011 and December 2015 were restaged by the AJCC 8th pathological prognosis staging system, and then overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) rates and hazard ratios (HR) were analyzed to compare the predictive fit of the two staging systems. Results Five hundred and seven patients who in whom postoperative radiotherapy was performed for breast cancer were enrolled in this study. 36.1% patients were downstaged and 5.3% patients were upstaged from the 7th to 8th editions staging system classification. Kaplan–Meier curves and HRs showed differences in OS and DFS rates between the 7th edition and 8th edition staging systems. The AJCC 8th edition prognostic stage system has a better prognostic prediction of OS and DFS than does the 7th edition anatomic stage system. Conclusions Compared with the 7th edition in breast cancer, AJCC 8th edition prognostic stage system has more precise stratification and superior prognostic value, providing a more accurate reference for the choice of radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation Study of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Prognostic Stage Compared With the Anatomic Stage in Breast CancerJAMA Oncology, 2018
- A Retrospective Survival Analysis of Anatomic and Prognostic Stage Group Based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Cancer Staging Manual in Luminal B Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative Breast CancerChinese Medical Journal, 2017
- Clinical use of biomarkers in breast cancer: Updated guidelines from the European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM)European Journal of Cancer, 2017
- Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline SummaryJournal of Oncology Practice, 2016
- Personalized therapy for breast cancerClinical Genetics, 2014
- Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2011
- Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistryThe Breast, 2011
- Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2005
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2002