Evaluating an app-guided self-test for influenza: lessons learned for improving the feasibility of study designs to evaluate self-tests for respiratory viruses
Open Access
- 29 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 21 (1), 1-12
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06314-1
Abstract
Background: Seasonal influenza leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Rapid self-tests could improve access to influenza testing in community settings. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a mobile app-guided influenza rapid self-test for adults with influenza like illness (ILI), and identify optimal methods for conducting accuracy studies for home-based assays for influenza and other respiratory viruses. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited adults who self-reported ILI online. Participants downloaded a mobile app, which guided them through two low nasal swab self-samples. Participants tested the index swab using a lateral flow assay. Test accuracy results were compared to the reference swab tested in a research laboratory for influenza A/B using a molecular assay. Results: Analysis included 739 participants, 80% were 25–64 years of age, 79% female, and 73% white. Influenza positivity was 5.9% based on the laboratory reference test. Of those who started their test, 92% reported a self-test result. The sensitivity and specificity of participants’ interpretation of the test result compared to the laboratory reference standard were 14% (95%CI 5–28%) and 90% (95%CI 87–92%), respectively. Conclusions: A mobile app facilitated study procedures to determine the accuracy of a home based test for influenza, however, test sensitivity was low. Recruiting individuals outside clinical settings who self-report ILI symptoms may lead to lower rates of influenza and/or less severe disease. Earlier identification of study subjects within 48 h of symptom onset through inclusion criteria and rapid shipping of tests or pre-positioning tests is needed to allow self-testing earlier in the course of illness, when viral load is higher.Funding Information
- Gates Ventures
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Equivalence of Self- and Staff-Collected Nasal Swabs for the Detection of Viral Respiratory PathogensPLOS ONE, 2012
- Effectiveness of Patient-Collected Swabs for Influenza TestingMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2012
- Development and Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule for the Diagnosis of InfluenzaThe Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 2012
- Performance of the QuickVue Influenza A+B Rapid Test for Pandemic H1N1 (2009) Virus Infection in AdultsPLOS ONE, 2011
- Poor Positive Accuracy of QuickVue Rapid Antigen Tests during the Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 PandemicJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2010
- Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting1Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, 2010
- Failure of Routine Diagnostic Methods to Detect Influenza in Hospitalized Older AdultsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2010
- Evaluation of QuickVue influenza A+B rapid test for detection of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009Journal of Clinical Virology, 2010
- Field Performance of a Rapid Diagnostic Test for Influenza in an Ambulatory SettingJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2009
- Antivirals for the treatment and prevention of epidemic and pandemic influenzaInfluenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, 2007