Latent Class Analysis and the Need for Clear Reporting of Methods
- 1 October 2021
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 73 (7), E2285-E2286
- https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1131
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal Testing Choice and Diagnostic Strategies for Latent Tuberculosis Infection Among US-Born People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2020
- World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regionsThe Lancet. Global Health, 2019
- Evaluating the accuracy and economic value of a new test in the absence of a perfect reference testResearch Synthesis Methods, 2017
- STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class ModelsPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 2017
- Diagnostic Test Accuracy in Childhood Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Bayesian Latent Class AnalysisAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2016
- STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studiesBMJ, 2015
- Latent Class Models in Diagnostic Studies When There is No Reference Standard--A Systematic ReviewAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2013
- Latent Tuberculosis Infection in the United StatesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Modeling conditional dependence between diagnostic tests: A multiple latent variable modelStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a reviewJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988