Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study
Open Access
- 1 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journal of Pain Research
- Vol. 13, 2947-2957
- https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S272943
Abstract
Purpose: Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) programs for chronic back pain are effective and recommended. The patient-centered and biopsychosocial nature of IMPT is grounded in contemporary understanding that chronic pain states reflect heightened sensitization of the nervous system rather than an issue in the tissue. Teaching patients about pain is part of IMPT programs, though a clinical guideline is lacking. This study aims to answer the following question: Does the addition of an evidence-based pain neuroscience education (PNE) lecture for patients, into an IMPT program, produce superior results than the IMPT program itself? Patients and Methods: A non-randomized, controlled intervention study was performed with 179 back pain patients indicated for IMPT. Intervention group (N=102) received a four-week IMPT program, which contained 4 one-hour sessions PNE. Control group (N=77) received the same IMPT without the additional PNE. Primary outcome was current pain after intervention. Pain knowledge, physical function, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life and fear-avoidance were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Outcomes were defined as change of the parameter measured before and immediately after the four-week IMPT. For each outcome, linear regression models were used to estimate the raw and adjusted (sex, age and BMI) effect of additional PNE. Results: Despite improvement in all outcomes for both groups during the treatment phase, the implemented PNE did not result in additional pain reduction (regression coefficient for PNE effect on pain level 0.34; 95% CI -6.23-6.97). Between-group differences could only be shown for pain-related knowledge in favor for the intervention group (0.78; 95% CI 0.35-1.20). Conclusion: The additional PNE lecture did not lead to pain reduction beyond the usual IMPT. However, the PNE did increase pain-related knowledge and, therefore, might be helpful in coping with pain after the IMPT program.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fifteen Years of Explaining Pain: The Past, Present, and FutureThe Journal of Pain, 2015
- Die Depressions-Angst-Stress-SkalenDer Schmerz, 2015
- Physiotherapists may stigmatise or feel unprepared to treat people with low back pain and psychosocial factors that influence recovery: a systematic reviewJournal of Physiotherapy, 2015
- Multimodale interdisziplinäre Therapie beim chronischen RückenschmerzOrthopädie und Unfallchirurgie up2date, 2014
- Multimodale Schmerztherapie für die Behandlung chronischer SchmerzsyndromeDer Schmerz, 2014
- Reliability and Construct Validity of Self-Report Questionnaires for Patients With Pelvic Girdle PainPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2012
- Gütekriterien der visuellen Analogskala zur Schmerzbewertungphysioscience, 2008
- Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back PainSpine, 2008
- Validation of the German version of the Fear‐Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)European Journal of Pain Supplements, 2000
- A 12-Item Short-Form Health SurveyMedical Care, 1996