Long-Term Benefits of Adding a Pedometer to Pulmonary Rehabilitation for COPD: The Randomized Controlled STAR Trial
Open Access
- 1 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Vol. ume 16, 1977-1988
- https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s304976
Abstract
Purpose: This Stay Active after Rehabilitation (STAR) study examined the effects of a pedometer-based behavioral intervention for individuals with COPD during three weeks of inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on patients’ physical activity levels six weeks and six months after PR, including steps (primary outcome), moderate-intensity physical activity, and sedentary time as well as patient quality of life, symptoms, and other psychological and clinical variables. Patients and Methods: Rehabilitation patients with COPD wore a triaxial accelerometer (ActiGraph wGT3X) for seven days two weeks before (T0) as well as six weeks (T3) and six months (T4) after PR. In addition to the three-week inpatient PR (control group, CG), the randomly allocated intervention group (IG) received a brief pedometer-based behavioral intervention with the application of the following behavior-change techniques: performing the behavior, individual goal-setting, self-monitoring, and feedback. The effects were analyzed using analysis of covariance with an intention-to-treat approach. Results: A total of 327 patients (69% male, age: 58 years, FEV1 (%): 53.5, six-minute walk distance: 447.8 m) were randomly allocated to either the IG (n = 167) or CG (n = 160). Although both groups increased their daily steps after PR (IG: MT3-T0 = 1152, CG: MT3-T0 = 745; IG: MT4-T0 = 795, CG: MT4-T0 = 300), the slightly higher increases in daily steps in the IG compared to the CG at T3 (Δ 388 steps, d = 0.16) and T4 (Δ 458 steps, d = 0.15) were not statistically significant (p > 0.05 for all). Patients in both groups showed moderate to high pre-post-changes in terms of secondary outcomes, but no advantage favoring the IG was found. Conclusion: The results show that adding a pedometer-based behavioral intervention to standard German three-week inpatient PR for COPD patients did not result in more physical activity in terms of steps and moderate-intensity physical activity or less sedentary time. However, both groups (IG and CG) showed remarkably enhanced physical activity levels six weeks and six months after PR, as well as improvements in other secondary outcomes (eg, quality of life).This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relationship between daily physical activity and exercise capacity in patients with COPDRespiratory Medicine, 2013
- Interrupting long periods of sitting: good STUFFInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2013
- Validity of Six Activity Monitors in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Comparison with Indirect CalorimetryPLOS ONE, 2012
- Accelerometer Use with Children, Older Adults, and Adults with Functional LimitationsMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2012
- Analyzing longitudinal data with missing values.Rehabilitation Psychology, 2011
- Der COPD-Angst-Fragebogen (CAF): Ein neues Instrument zur Erfassung krankheitsspezifischer Ängste bei COPD-PatientenPPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie, 2010
- Impact of changes in physical activity on health-related quality of life among patients with COPDEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2010
- ATS StatementAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- A Self-complete Measure of Health Status for Chronic Airflow Limitation: The St. George's Respiratory QuestionnaireAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1992
- Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health StatusMedical Care, 1989