Change in Health Literacy over a Decade in a Prospective Cohort of Community-Dwelling Older Adults
- 1 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 36 (4), 916-922
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06423-8
Abstract
Background Health literacy is often viewed as a static trait in longitudinal studies, which may over or underestimate an individual's ability to manage one's health. Objectives We sought to examine health literacy over time among older adults using three widely used measures. Design A prospective cohort study. Participants Community-dwelling adults ages 55 to 74 at baseline with at least one follow-up visit (N = 656) recruited from one academic internal medicine clinic and six community health centers in Chicago, IL. Measures Health literacy was measured using the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), Newest Vital Sign (NVS), and Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) at baseline and up to three follow-up time points. Results In unadjusted analyses, significant changes since baseline were found beginning at the second follow-up (mean (M) = 6.0 years, SD = 0.6) for the TOFHLA (M = - 0.9, SD = 0.95, p = 0.049) and the REALM (M = 0.3, SD = 2.5, p = 0.004) and at the last follow-up (M = 8.6 years, SD = 0.5) for the NVS (M = - 0.2, SD = 1.4, p = 0.02). There were non-linear effects of baseline age on TOFHLA and NVS scores over time (piecewise cubic spline p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) and no effect on REALM scores (B = 0.02, 95% CI - 0.01 to 0.04, p = 0.17) using multivariable mixed-effects linear regression models, controlling for race, education, income, and comorbidity. Conclusion We found a negative relationship between age and health literacy over time as measured by the TOFHLA and NVS. Health literacy barriers appear to be more prevalent among individuals in later life, when self-care demands are similarly increasing. Clinicians might consider strategies to assess and respond to limited health literacy, particularly among patients 70 and older. REALM performance remained stable over 10 years of follow-up. This questions whether health literacy tools measure the same attribute. Prospective health literacy studies should carefully consider what measures to use, depending on their objective.Funding Information
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG030611)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HL116630)
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic ReviewAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- In search of ‘low health literacy’: Threshold vs. gradient effect of literacy on health status and mortalitySocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2010
- Health Literacy and Cognitive Performance in Older AdultsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2009
- Up to a quarter of the Australian population may have suboptimal health literacy depending upon the measurement tool: results from a population-based surveyHealth Promotion International, 2009
- Assessment and measurement of health literacy: An integrative review of the literatureNursing & Health Sciences, 2009
- Cognition and Health Literacy in Patients with HypertensionJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Health Literacy, Cognitive Abilities, and Mortality Among Elderly PersonsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Limited Literacy in Older People and Disparities in Health and Healthcare AccessJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2006
- Literacy and health outcomesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2004
- Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data (Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, No. 72)Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2000