AI ≥ Journalism: How the Chinese Copyright Law Protects Tech Giants’ AI Innovations and Disrupts the Journalistic Institution
Open Access
- 28 September 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Digital Journalism
- Vol. 10 (10), 1893-1912
- https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2120032
Abstract
Journalism and other institutions clash over automated news generation, algorithmic distribution and content ownership worldwide. AI policies are the main mechanisms that establish and organise the hierarchies among these institutions. Few studies, however, have explored the normative dimension of AI in policymaking in journalism, especially beyond the West. This case study inspects the copyright law’s impact on AI innovation in newsrooms in the unexamined Chinese context. Using neo-institutional theory and policy network theory, the study investigates the Third Amendment to the Chinese Copyright Law, exemplary court cases regarding automated journalism copyright disputes (such as Tencent v. Yingxun and Film v. Baidu), and other supporting documents. The findings show how China’s copyright legal framework separates authorship and ownership; defines “originality” and “creativity” in human-machine collaboration; and prioritises tech companies while undermining journalistic autonomy. We argue that the law’s eager embrace of AI may give tech companies an advantage over news organisations that do not necessarily have a strategy to adopt AI. Moreover, it favours state-owned, resource-rich official media over the private sector. An implication of this shifting power dynamic is the possibility of privately owned news media being marginalised, resulting in even stronger state control over media production and information flow.Keywords
Funding Information
- the Ander Foundation: Anne Marie och Gustav Anders Stiftelse för mediaforskning
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Automated Journalism 2.0: Event-driven narrativesJournalism Practice, 2017
- Actors, Actants, Audiences, and Activities in Cross-Media News WorkDigital Journalism, 2014
- Patricia Thornton, William Ocasio, and Michael Lounsbury: The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and ProcessAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2013
- APPLYING POLICY NETWORK THEORY TO POLICY-MAKING IN CHINA: THE CASE OF URBAN HEALTH INSURANCE REFORMPublic Administration, 2010
- The Institutional Logic of Collusion among Local Governments in ChinaModern China, 2009
- Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research MethodQualitative Research Journal, 2009
- Institutional LogicsPublished by SAGE Publications ,2008
- Understanding Governance: Ten Years OnOrganization Studies, 2007
- Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 1990American Journal of Sociology, 1999
- The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational FieldsAmerican Sociological Review, 1983