Randomized experimental testing of new survey approaches to improve abortion reporting in the United States
Open Access
- 13 December 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Guttmacher Institute in Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Vol. 54 (4), 142-155
- https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12217
Abstract
Context: Abortions are substantially underreported in surveys due to social stigma, compromising the study of abortion, pregnancy, fertility, and related demographic and health outcomes.Methods: In this study, we evaluated six methodological approaches identified through formative mixed-methods research to improve the measurement of abortion in surveys. These approaches included altering the placement of abortion items in the survey, the order of pregnancy outcome questions, the level of detail, the introduction to the abortion question, and the context of the abortion question, and using graduated sensitivity. We embedded a preregistered randomized experiment in a newly designed online survey about sexual and reproductive health behaviors (N = 6536). We randomized respondents to experimental arms in a fully crossed factorial design; we estimated an average treatment effect using standardized estimators from logistic regression models, adjusted for demographic covariates associated with reporting.Results: None of the experimental arms significantly improved abortion reporting compared to the control condition.Conclusion: More work is needed to improve reporting of abortion in future surveys, particularly as abortion access becomes increasingly restricted in the United States. Despite this study's null results, it provides a promising path for future efforts to improve abortion measurement. It is proof of concept for testing new approaches in a less expensive, faster, and more flexible format than embedding changes in existing national fertility surveys.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Stigma of Having an Abortion: Development of a Scale and Characteristics of Women Experiencing Abortion StigmaPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2013
- Stigma, Abortion, and Disclosure—Findings from a Qualitative StudyThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2012
- Correlates of perceived and internalized stigma among abortion patients in the USA: An exploration by race and Hispanic ethnicityInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2012
- Abortion Stigma: A Reconceptualization of Constituents, Causes, and ConsequencesWomen's Health Issues, 2011
- Conceptualising abortion stigmaCulture, Health & Sexuality, 2009
- Covariate adjustment in randomized trials with binary outcomes: Targeted maximum likelihood estimationStatistics in Medicine, 2008
- Sensitive questions in surveys.Psychological Bulletin, 2007
- Spacing, Position, and Order: Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey QuestionsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2004
- Question Comprehension and Recall: The Reporting of Induced Abortions in Quantitative Surveys on the General PopulationPopulation, English version, 2004
- Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question ContextPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1996