Baby-box schemes in England: parent and practitioner experiences, and recommendations
Open Access
- 11 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Pediatrics
- Vol. 20 (1), 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02064-2
Abstract
Programmes offering carboard baby boxes to parents in England began in some NHS Trusts in 2016. This study aimed to examine the strengths and weaknesses of English baby-box schemes as experienced by healthcare providers and parents. An independent mixed-methods evaluation was conducted via telephone interviews and online surveys with healthcare providers and parents in all 7/9 NHS regions of England where baby-box schemes were established 2016–2019. Participants responded to requests circulated electronically by NHS Research & Design Departments, and infant health organisations in England. The objectives were to identify how parents and healthcare providers understood and experienced baby-box schemes implemented in England to date, and to produce recommendations for organisations considering involvement in future schemes. Baby-box schemes changed over time, and were complex to run and monitor. Both parents and practitioners were misinformed about their purpose and origins. Partnerships with a commercial box-provider reduced the investment needed to run a baby-box scheme, and offered potential benefits to staff regarding engagement with families via online education and face-to-face contact around handover of boxes, but carried unforeseen costs. Of particular concern was the box-provider’s access to parent personal details being promoted by NHS staff and parents’ lack of awareness; the hidden costs incurred by NHS facilities of running a box-scheme; and the costs incurred by parents in accessing their ‘free’ box. Sixteen recommendations are proposed for healthcare providers and organisations considering commercial - health-provider baby-box partnerships in future. Many assumptions exist about the origins and purpose of baby-boxes; this misinformation needs correcting, especially as it relates to infant death reduction and safe infant sleep. Baby-box schemes take multiple forms from those motivated by social welfare to those motivated by commercial profit. The English experience of partnership schemes between healthcare facilities and commercial box-providers reveals some success stories, along with multiple points of ambiguity, unanticipated difficulty, and concerns for infant safety.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mothers’ Perceptions of the Cardboard Box as a Potential Sleep SpaceAcademic Pediatrics, 2019
- Innovation to prevent sudden infant death: the wahakura as an Indigenous vision for a safe sleep environmentAustralian Journal of Primary Health, 2019
- Effect of Education and Cardboard Bassinet Distribution on Newborn Bed-SharingGlobal Pediatric Health, 2019
- Conducting Online SurveysJournal of Human Lactation, 2018
- Concerns about the promotion of a cardboard baby box as a place for infants to sleepBMJ, 2018
- All about… Baby Room ProjectsNursery World, 2017
- UNITING CULTURAL PRACTICES AND SAFE SLEEP ENVIRONMENTS FOR VULNERABLE INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIAN INFANTS.2017
- Safe sleep advice to safe sleep action: Trial of an innovative Safe Infant Sleep Enabler—The Pepi-PodWomen and Birth, 2013
- Profits from pregnancy: how trusted organisations sell out women to commercial interestsBMJ, 2013
- An evaluation of portable sleeping spaces for babies following the Christchurch earthquake of February 2011Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2013