Use of intravascular optical coherence tomography or intravascular ultrasound to guide stent implantation. The choice is yours!
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Europa Digital & Publishing in EuroIntervention
- Vol. 16 (13), 1041-1043
- https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv16i13a189
Abstract
The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes of optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation: one-year results from the ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI trialEuroIntervention, 2021
- Optical coherence tomography-guided coronary stent implantation compared to angiography: a multicentre randomised trial in PCI – design and rationale of ILUMIEN IV: OPTIMAL PCIEuroIntervention, 2021
- Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular InterventionsEuropean Heart Journal, 2018
- Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular UltrasoundJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2015
- Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I studyEuropean Heart Journal, 2015
- Consensus Standards for Acquisition, Measurement, and Reporting of Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Studies: A Report From the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and ValidationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012