The ABC’s of Ecological and Nutrition Labels. The Impact of Label Theme and Complexity on the Environmental Footprint of Online Grocery Choices
Open Access
- 25 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 13 (5), 2474
- https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052474
Abstract
Current food production and consumption patterns pose serious threats to our global environment. The goal of the current research is to investigate whether the presence of specific informational cues, i.e., ecological labels and nutrition labels, can improve the environmental impact of food choices. Two online experiments were carried out in which young adults were asked to select products in a grocery shop setting, and to indicate quantities (in grams) for a hypothetical one-person meal. In the first experiment (N = 142), we varied the theme (sustainability vs. nutrition vs. control) of the labels alongside the products. The labels displayed a summarized product score (i.e., the products’ actual nutri-score), but this was either presented as the nutritional score or as the ecological score of that product. In the second experiment (N = 250), we again varied this label theme as well as the level of complexity, namely interpretative (i.e., simple) vs. reductive (i.e., detailed). While the results of the first experiment revealed no impact of the labels, the results of the second experiment suggest that labels with a sustainability theme can influence young adults to compose a more sustainable meal with less meat, and with a lower carbon and blue water footprint. The labels’ level of complexity did not impact the different eating outcomes. In conclusion, while these results point to the potential use of labels with a sustainability theme, it is important to note that the results did not consistently replicate across studies and analyses and should therefore be interpreted with caution. A possible explanation for the effect of eco-themed labels might be that they trigger pro-environmental objectives during decision-making, and prime people to consider the sustainability of their food choices.This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Drivers of meat consumptionAppetite, 2019
- Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systemsThe Lancet, 2019
- Predicting food choice: a meta-analysis based on the theory of planned behaviorBritish Food Journal, 2019
- Predictors of food decision making: A systematic interdisciplinary mapping (SIM) reviewAppetite, 2017
- Qualitative assessment of eco-labels on fresh produce in Flanders (Belgium) highlights a potential intention–performance gap for the supply chainJournal of Cleaner Production, 2017
- The Impacts of Dietary Change on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use, Water Use, and Health: A Systematic ReviewPLOS ONE, 2016
- Food choices, health and environment: Effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intakeGlobal Environmental Change, 2014
- Why Eco‐labels can be Effective Marketing Tools: Evidence from a Study on Italian ConsumersBusiness Strategy and the Environment, 2013
- Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic foodJournal of Consumer Behaviour, 2007
- Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude – Behavioral Intention” GapJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2006