Can public sector community health workers deliver a nurturing care intervention in South Africa? The Amagugu Asakhula feasibility study
Open Access
- 27 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Pilot and Feasibility Studies
- Vol. 7 (1), 1-13
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00802-6
Abstract
Nurturing care interventions have the potential to promote health and development in early childhood. Amagugu Asakhula was designed to promote developmentally important dietary and movement behaviours among children of preschool age (3–5 years) in South Africa. An initial formative study in Cape Town found the intervention to be feasible and acceptable when delivered by community health workers (CHWs) linked to a community-based organisation. This study evaluated the delivery of the Amagugu Asakhula intervention by CHWs linked to a public sector primary health care facility in Soweto, as this mode of delivery could have more potential for sustainability and scalability. A qualitative design was utilised to assess feasibility, acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, implementation, fidelity and context. CHWs (n = 14) delivered the intervention to caregivers (n = 23) of preschool-age children in Soweto over 6 weeks. Following the completion of the intervention, focus group discussions were held with CHWs and caregivers. Further data were obtained through observations, study records and key informant interviews (n = 5). Data were analysed using deductive thematic analysis guided by a process evaluation framework. The delivery of the Amagugu Asakhula intervention through CHWs linked to a primary health care facility in Soweto was not found to be feasible due to contextual challenges such as late payment of salaries influencing CHW performance and willingness to deliver the intervention. CHWs expressed dissatisfaction with their general working conditions and were thus reluctant to take on new tasks. Despite barriers to successful delivery, the intervention was well received by both CHWs and caregivers and was considered a good fit with the CHWs’ scope of work. Based on these findings, delivery of the Amagugu Asakhula intervention is not recommended through public sector CHWs in South Africa. This feasibility study informs the optimisation of implementation and supports further testing of the intervention’s effectiveness when delivered by CHWs linked to community-based organisations. The present study further demonstrates how implementation challenges can be identified through qualitative feasibility studies and subsequently addressed prior to large-scale trials, avoiding the wasting of research and resources.Funding Information
- Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/7, MC_UU_12015/7)
- Newton Fund (ES/N013891/1)
- National Research Foundation (UID:98561)
- Ernest Oppenheimer Memorial Trust (OMT Ref. 21239/01)
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standards for Reporting Qualitative ResearchAcademic Medicine, 2014
- Task-shifting and prioritization: a situational analysis examining the role and experiences of community health workers in MalawiHuman Resources for Health, 2014
- Republished research: Implementation research: what it is and how to do itBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2014
- Review of implementation processes for integrated nutrition and psychosocial stimulation interventionsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2013
- Maternal HIV disclosure to HIV-uninfected children in rural South Africa: a pilot study of a family-based interventionBMC Public Health, 2013
- Community oriented primary care in Tshwane District, South Africa: Assessing the first phase of implementationAfrican Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine, 2013
- How We Design Feasibility StudiesAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2009
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- South African paediatric food-based dietary guidelinesMaternal & Child Nutrition, 2007
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006