Parental math input is not uniformly beneficial for young children: The moderating role of inhibitory control.
- 1 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Educational Psychology
- Vol. 114 (5), 1178-1191
- https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000679
Abstract
Recent work has stressed the importance of considering child-level propensities and environmental opportunities when studying early math achievement; however, few studies investigate the interaction between these factors. This study examined whether children's inhibitory control moderates the association between parental math input and children's math performance. Parental math input via number talk and parent-reported frequencies of math activities were measured in 123 children (M-age = 3.9 years) and one of their parents. High levels of parent number talk were associated with higher math achievement among children with higher inhibitory control. This association was not seen in children with lower inhibitory control, for children's vocabulary as the outcome measure, or for parents' overall talk or parent-reported math activities as the opportunity measures. Thus, children may differentially benefit from parental math input depending on their cognitive abilities and this association is specific to parental number talk and children's math abilities. Educational Impact and Implications Statement Parents who engage in more frequent math activities and talk more about math with their young children tend to have children who show better math skills, but there are mixed results and not every study has replicated this effect. We suggest that these inconsistencies may be due to child factors that help some children benefit more than others from their parents' math input. Specifically, we find that high levels of parents' math input are only related to better math performance when their 3- to 4-year-old children are better at ignoring distractions and focusing on relevant information. This suggests that not all children benefit equally from parent math input, and so interventions promoting math input at home must also consider children's skills and characteristics rather than simply addressing parents' behaviors.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (DUE1534830)
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (T32GM081760)
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics AchievementPLOS ONE, 2013
- Some types of parent number talk count more than others: relations between parents’ input and children’s cardinal-number knowledgeDevelopmental Science, 2011
- A review of the day–night task: The Stroop paradigm and interference control in young childrenDevelopmental Review, 2010
- What counts in the development of young children's number knowledge?Developmental Psychology, 2010
- How Do Parents Support Preschoolers’ Numeracy Learning Experiences at Home?Early Childhood Education Journal, 2009
- Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young childrenDevelopmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2009
- Short-Term Memory, Working Memory, and Executive Functioning in Preschoolers: Longitudinal Predictors of Mathematical Achievement at Age 7 YearsDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 2008
- Maternal Parenting and Children's Conscience: Early Security as ModeratorChild Development, 2004
- Girls' and boys' developing interests in math and science: Do parents matter?New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2004
- The relationship between cognition and action: performance of children 312–7 years old on a stroop- like day-night testCognition, 1994