Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements About Pain Management in Critically Ill End-of-Life Patients: A Systematic Review
- 1 November 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 47 (11), 1619-1626
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000003975
Abstract
To identify and synthesize available recommendations from scientific societies and experts on pain management at the end-of-life in the ICU. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Biblioteca Virtual en Salud from their inception until March 28, 2019. We included all clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements, and benchmarks for quality. Study selection, methodological quality, and data extraction were performed independently by two investigators. A quality assessment was performed by four investigators using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. The recommendations were then synthesized and categorized. Ten publications were included. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II statement showed low scores in various quality domains, especially in the applicability and rigor of development. Most documents were in agreement on five topics: 1) using a quantitative tool for pain assessment; 2) administering narcotics for pain relief and benzodiazepines for anxiety relief; 3) against prescribing neuromuscular blockers during withdrawal of life support to assess pain; 4) endorsing the use of high doses of opioids and sedatives for pain control, regardless of the risk that they will hasten death; and 5) using quality indicators to improve pain management during end-of-life in the ICU. In spite of the lack of high-quality evidence, recommendations for pain management at the end-of-life in the ICU are homogeneous and are justified by ethical principles and agreement among experts. Considering the growing demand for the involvement of palliative care teams in the management of the dying patients in the ICU, there is a need to clearly define their early involvement and to further develop comprehensive evidence-based pain management strategies. Based on the study findings, we propose a management algorithm to improve the overall care of dying critically ill patients.This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meeting standards of high-quality intensive care unit palliative careCritical Care Medicine, 2012
- Palliative care, double effect and the law in AustraliaInternal Medicine Journal, 2011
- Quality Assurance and Assessment in Pain ManagementAnesthesiology Clinics, 2011
- AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health careCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2010
- Anticipation of distress after discontinuation of mechanical ventilation in the ICU at the end of lifeIntensive Care Medicine, 2008
- Recomendaciones de tratamiento al final de la vida del paciente críticoMedicina Intensiva (English Edition), 2008
- Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: A consensus statement by the American College of Critical Care MedicineCritical Care Medicine, 2008
- Relieving suffering or intentionally hastening death: Where do you draw the line?*Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Proposed quality measures for palliative care in the critically ill: A consensus from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care WorkgroupCritical Care Medicine, 2006
- Quality indicators for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit*Critical Care Medicine, 2003