The Route, Dose, and Interval of Epinephrine for Neonatal Resuscitation: A Systematic Review
- 1 October 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in PEDIATRICS
- Vol. 146 (4)
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-0586
Abstract
Video Abstract CONTEXT: Current International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation recommendations on epinephrine administration during neonatal resuscitation were derived in 2010 from indirect evidence in animal or pediatric studies. OBJECTIVE: Systematic review of human infant and relevant animal studies comparing other doses, routes, and intervals of epinephrine administration in neonatal resuscitation with (currently recommended) administration of 0.01 to 0.03 mg/kg doses given intravenously (IV) every 3 to 5 minutes. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and trial registry databases. STUDY SELECTION: Predefined criteria were used for selection. DATA EXTRACTION: Risk of bias was assessed by using published tools appropriate for the study type. Certainty of evidence was assessed by using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: Only 2 of 4 eligible cohort studies among 593 unique retrieved records yielded data allowing comparisons. There were no differences between IV and endotracheal epinephrine for the primary outcome of death at hospital discharge (risk ratio = 1.03 [95% confidence interval 0.62 to 1.71]) or for failure to achieve return of spontaneous circulation, time to return of spontaneous circulation (1 study; 50 infants), or proportion receiving additional epinephrine (2 studies; 97 infants). There were no differences in outcomes between 2 endotracheal doses (1 study). No human infant studies were found in which authors addressed IV dose or dosing interval. LIMITATIONS: The search yielded sparse human evidence of very low certainty (downgraded for serious risk of bias and imprecision). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of epinephrine by endotracheal versus IV routes resulted in similar survival and other outcomes. However, in animal studies, researchers continue to suggest benefit of IV administration using currently recommended doses.This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Umbilical Venous and Intraosseous Access During Simulated Neonatal ResuscitationPEDIATRICS, 2011
- Neonatal Resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment RecommendationsPEDIATRICS, 2010
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Use and Efficacy of Endotracheal Versus Intravenous Epinephrine During Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Delivery RoomPEDIATRICS, 2006
- A Comparison of High-Dose and Standard-Dose Epinephrine in Children with Cardiac ArrestThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Favourable neurological outcomes following delivery room cardiopulmonary resuscitation of infants ≤ 750 g at birthJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2000
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Delivery RoomArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1995
- Effects of graded doses of epinephrine during asphxia-induced bradycardia in newborn lambsResuscitation, 1993
- High dose epinephrine in refractory pediatric cardiac arrestCritical Care Medicine, 1989