Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Top Cited Papers
- 4 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 384 (9), 829-841
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2026982
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus cabozantinib as compared with those of sunitinib in the treatment of previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma are not known. METHODS In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned adults with previously untreated clear-cell, advanced renal-cell carcinoma to receive either nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) plus cabozantinib (40 mg once daily) or sunitinib (50 mg once daily for 4 weeks of each 6-week cycle). The primary end point was progression-free survival, as determined by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response as determined by independent review, and safety. Health-related quality of life was an exploratory end point. RESULTS Overall, 651 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab plus cabozantinib (323 patients) or sunitinib (328 patients). At a median follow-up of 18.1 months for overall survival, the median progression-free survival was 16.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.5 to 24.9) with nivolumab plus cabozantinib and 8.3 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 9.7) with sunitinib (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.64; P<0.001). The probability of overall survival at 12 months was 85.7% (95% CI, 81.3 to 89.1) with nivolumab plus cabozantinib and 75.6% (95% CI, 70.5 to 80.0) with sunitinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.60; 98.89% CI, 0.40 to 0.89; P = 0.001). An objective response occurred in 55.7% of the patients receiving nivolumab plus cabozantinib and in 27.1% of those receiving sunitinib (P<0.001). Efficacy benefits with nivolumab plus cabozantinib were consistent across subgroups. Adverse events of any cause of grade 3 or higher occurred in 75.3% of the 320 patients receiving nivolumab plus cabozantinib and in 70.6% of the 320 patients receiving sunitinib. Overall, 19.7% of the patients in the combination group discontinued at least one of the trial drugs owing to adverse events, and 5.6% discontinued both. Patients reported better health-related quality of life with nivolumab plus cabozantinib than with sunitinib. CONCLUSIONS Nivolumab plus cabozantinib had significant benefits over sunitinib with respect to progression-free survival, overall survival, and likelihood of response in patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; CheckMate 9ER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141177.)Keywords
Funding Information
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
- Ipsen Pharma
- ONO Pharmaceutical Company Ltd.
- Exelixis Inc.
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd.
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nivolumab in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: clinical trial evidence and experienceTherapeutic Advances in Urology, 2016
- Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (METEOR): final results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2016
- Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell CarcinomaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- External validation and comparison with other models of the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model: a population-based studyThe Lancet Oncology, 2013
- Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor–Targeted Agents: Results From a Large, Multicenter StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Hierarchical testing of multiple endpoints in group‐sequential trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- A Comparison of the Renal Cell Carcinoma–Symptom Index (RCC-SI) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI)Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2009
- A Multiple Testing Procedure for Clinical TrialsBiometrics, 1979
- THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIALBiometrika, 1934