Examining the Urban and Rural Healthcare Progress in Big Cities of China: Analysis of Monitoring Data in Dalian from 2008 to 2017
Open Access
- 11 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 17 (4), 1148
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041148
Abstract
How to effectively reduce the disparity between urban and rural medical healthcare has become a major global concern. In China, the government has issued a series of reform measures to address the gap between urban and rural medical care. To explore the impact of China’s medical system reforms in improving health services in urban and rural areas and understand the factors promoting and hindering progress, we evaluated the healthcare system in Dalian City, China, from 2008 to 2017. The weighted TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) model was used to assess the development of the healthcare system in the different districts and employed the obstacle model to identify and analyze indicators that hinder progress in health services. Using the local spatial clustering function, we categorized the districts in terms of the hindrance type that significantly hamper the growth of the healthcare system. Our results show the healthcare system in Dalian’s urban areas has steadily increased, while development in rural areas has been erratic. Although the urban–rural healthcare disparity has narrowed distinctly, sustained progress is not guaranteed. Based on the location theory, residents in urban areas are more affected by economic factors, while those in rural areas are more influenced by time considerations. When initiating healthcare reforms in urban areas, the impact of varying land prices and per capita disposable income should be considered. For rural areas, constructing more medical institutions to reduce the impact of time costs should be considered. We also found different factors that hinder the growth of the healthcare system for urban and rural areas. To address these impediments to progress, urban areas should pay more attention to coordinated development, while rural areas should address specific concerns based on local needs and conditions. More research on the progress in medical reform is crucial to provide reference and policy-guidance for countries facing similar concerns.This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social and Medical Vulnerability Factors of Emergency Department Frequent Users in a Universal Health Insurance SystemAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2012
- Impacto de una crisis sociolaboral en la demanda de atención en salud mental (crisis del calzado, Elche 2004)Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2011
- The evaluation of tourism destination competitiveness by TOPSIS & information entropy – A case in the Yangtze River Delta of ChinaTourism Management, 2011
- Has universal health insurance reduced socioeconomic inequalities in urban and rural health service use in Thailand?Health & Place, 2010
- A comparison of rural and urban healthcare consumption and health insuranceChina Agricultural Economic Review, 2010
- Development of an expert selection system to choose ideal cities for medical service venturesExpert Systems with Applications, 2009
- URBAN SAFETY MANAGEMENT: HOW TO DEAL WITH COMPLEXITYAdvances in Complex Systems, 2007
- Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessaryEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2003
- A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weightsEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1999
- Economic Determinism: A Model of the Political Economy of Medical CareInternational Journal of Health Services, 1973