An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research
Open Access
- 23 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Trials
- Vol. 21 (1), 1-13
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04235-z
Abstract
Non-communicable chronic diseases are linked to behavioral risk factors (including smoking, poor diet and physical inactivity), so effective behavior change interventions are needed to improve population health. However, uptake and impact of these interventions is limited by methodological challenges. We aimed to identify and achieve consensus on priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research among an international behavioral science community. An international, Delphi consensus study was conducted. Fifteen core members of the International Behavioral Trials Network (IBTN) were invited to generate methodological items that they consider important. From these, the research team agreed a “long-list” of unique items. Two online surveys were administered to IBTN members (N = 306). Respondents rated the importance of items on a 9-point scale, and ranked their “top-five” priorities. In the second survey, respondents received feedback on others’ responses, before rerating items and re-selecting their top five. Nine experts generated 144 items, which were condensed to a long-list of 33 items. The four most highly endorsed items, in both surveys 1 (n = 77) and 2 (n = 57), came from two thematic categories:“Intervention development” (“Specifying intervention components” and “Tailoring interventions to specific populations and contexts”) and “Implementation” (“How to disseminate behavioral trial research findings to increase implementation” and “Methods for ensuring that behavioral interventions are implementable into practice and policy”). “Development of novel research designs to test behavioral interventions” also emerged as a highly ranked research priority. From a wide array of identified methodological issues, intervention development, implementation and novel research designs are key themes to drive the future behavioral trials’ research agenda. Funding bodies should prioritize these issues in resource allocation.Funding Information
- Ireland Canada University Foundation (James M. Flaherty Visiting Professor Award 2016-17)
- Health Research Board (RL-2013-8)
- Institute of Population and Public Health (MPE 309504)
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping reviewBMJ Open, 2013
- Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation researchImplementation Science, 2012
- Advantages and Limitations of the e-Delphi TechniqueAmerican Journal of Health Education, 2012
- Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocolImplementation Science, 2011
- Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific methodImplementation Science, 2009
- Current issues and new directions inPsychology and Health: What is the future of digital interventions for health behaviour change?Psychology & Health, 2009
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategiesStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United StatesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services researchBMJ, 1995