The semiology of humour
Open Access
- 20 July 2021
- journal article
- Published by Estonian Literary Museum Scholarly Press in The European Journal of Humour Research
- Vol. 9 (2), 7-25
- https://doi.org/10.7592/ejhr2021.9.2.553
Abstract
A semiology-based approach to understanding humour is being developed and an interpretation of humour as a “counter-sign,” a two-faced sign within the space of conventionality, is put forward. The range of core attributes to interpret the phenomenon of humour is determined. The concepts of the “frame of significance,” “conventionality,” and “meta-communicative marker of conventionality” are elaborated. The general definition of humour is being formulated as a “sign-based identification of non-identifiable signs within the space of conventionality.” An outline is put forward to enable the formal distinction between satire, humour, irony, and jokes. The following questions are addressed: “Why does that which is funny cease to be so if it is repeated many times?”, “Why can the terrifying become funny when recollected?” “Why is the state of bewilderment not always funny but returning to it in one’s thoughts triggers laughter?”Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- There is an after-life (for jokes, anyway): The potential for, and appeal of, ‘immortality’ in humorHUMOR, 2018
- How to Understand and Assess a Theory: The Evolution of the SSTH into the GTVH and Now into the OSTHJournal of Literary Theory, 2009
- Humor theory and the fear of being laughed atHUMOR, 2009
- Introduction to the Psychology of HumorPublished by Elsevier BV ,2007
- Critique of Pure ReasonPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2007
- Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasmHUMOR, 2003
- Humorous TextsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2001
- Semantic Mechanisms of HumorPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1984
- Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, Vol. 2Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1975
- Studies in logic by members of the Johns Hopkins University.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1883