Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts
Open Access
- 24 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
- Vol. 20 (1), 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01433-0
Abstract
Where each patient has all three conduits of internal mammary artery (IMA), saphenous vein graft (SVG) and radial artery (RA), most confounders affecting comparison between conduits can be mitigated. Additionally, since SVG progressively fails over time, restricting patient angiography to the late period only can mitigate against early SVG patency that may have occluded in the late period. Research protocol driven conventional angiography was performed for patients with at least one of each conduit of IMA, RA and SVG and a minimum of 7 years postoperative. The primary analysis was perfect patency and secondary analysis was overall patency including angiographic evidence of conduit lumen irregularity from conduit atheroma. Multivariable generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used. Patency excluded occluded or “string sign” conduits. Perfect patency was present in patent grafts if there was no lumen irregularity. Fifty patients underwent coronary angiography at overall duration postoperative 13.1 ± 2.9, and age 74.3 ± 7.0 years. Of 196 anastomoses, IMA 62, RA 77 and SVG 57. Most IMA were to the left anterior descending territory and most RA and SVG were to the circumflex and right coronary territories. Perfect patency RA 92.2% was not different to IMA 96.8%, P = 0.309; and both were significantly better than SVG 17.5%, P < 0.001. Patency RA 93.5% was also not different to IMA 96.8%, P = 0.169, and both arterial conduits were significantly higher than SVG 82.5%, P = 0.029. Grafting according to coronary territory was not significant for perfect patency, P = 0.997 and patency P = 0.289. Coronary stenosis predicted perfect patency for RA only, P = 0.030 and for patency, RA, P = 0.007, and SVG, P = 0.032. When both arterial conduits were combined, perfect patency, P < 0.001, and patency, P = 0.017, were superior to SVG. All but one patent internal mammary artery or radial artery grafts had perfect patency and had superior perfect patency and overall patency compared to saphenous vein grafts.Other Versions
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: A randomized trialThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2015
- Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using the Radial ArteryCirculation, 2012
- Reappraisal of a 20-year experience with the radial artery as a conduit for coronary bypass graftingEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2011
- Saphenous Vein Grafts With Multiple Versus Single Distal Targets in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryCirculation, 2011
- Understanding Saphenous Vein Graft PatencyCirculation, 2011
- Radial Artery Conduits Improve Long-Term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2010
- Comparison of Saphenous Vein and Internal Thoracic Artery Graft Patency by Coronary SystemThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: Results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative StudyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2004
- Postoperative radial artery angiography for coronary artery bypass surgeryEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2000
- Total arterial coronary revascularization and factors influencing in-hospital mortalityEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1999