Increasing identification of foot at risk of complications in patients with diabetes: a quality improvement project in an urban primary health centre in India
Open Access
- 6 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Open Quality
- Vol. 9 (3), e000893
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000893
Abstract
The majority of foot amputations are preventable in people with diabetes. Guidelines recommend that people with diabetes should receive a foot examination for risk assessment, at least annually. In an audit at a primary health centre (PHC) in Mumbai, India, no patient with diabetes was offered preventive foot assessment in preceding 12 months. Problem analysis identified a lack of clinic policy, training and equipment for foot assessment. There was no standardised referral pathway for patients identified with foot at risk of diabetes complications. Furthermore, limited data review, high patient volumes and little time available with healthcare providers were important constraints. A quality improvement project was carried out at the PHC from January to September 2017. The project aimed at increasing compliance to standardised foot assessment in patients with diabetes presenting to the PHC from a baseline of 0% to 100% over 6 months. This would help identify patients having a foot at risk of complications due to diabetes. The Quality Standard on foot assessment was adopted from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Diabetic Foot Guideline. The electronic medical record (EMR) was standardised, health providers were trained, PHC processes and referral pathways were redesigned. Plan-Do-Study-Act was used to address barriers with weekly data review. 88.2% (848) of patients with diabetes visiting the PHC during the study period received a foot examination. Out of these, 11% (95) were identified to have a foot at risk and referred to a specialist foot centre. 57% of referred patients followed with specialised foot protection services. Training of healthcare providers, standardisation of processes and regular data feedback can improve diabetic foot care. Integrating quality indicators in the EMR helps monitor compliance. The inability to use doctor’s time efficiently was the biggest challenge and sustaining the change will require organisational changes with suitable task shifting.Funding Information
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1134345)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic review of the application of the plan–do–study–act method to improve quality in healthcareBMJ Quality & Safety, 2013
- Clinical Profile of Diabetic Foot in IndiaThe International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 2010
- Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 2010
- Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2010Diabetes Care, 2010
- Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomesPublished by Wiley ,2006
- Primary Care: Is There Enough Time for Prevention?American Journal of Public Health, 2003
- A descriptive study of managed-care hassles in 26 practicesWestern Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Assessment of documented foot examinations for patients with diabetes in inner-city primary care clinicsArchives of Family Medicine, 1995
- How Does Provider and Patient Awareness of High-Risk Status for Lower-Extremity Amputation Influence Foot-Care Practice?Diabetes Care, 1994
- Identifying Diabetic Patients at High Risk for Lower-Extremity Amputation in a Primary Health Care Setting: A prospective evaluation of simple screening criteriaDiabetes Care, 1992