KAP-COVIDGLOBAL: a multinational survey of the levels and determinants of public knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19
Open Access
- 23 February 2021
- Vol. 11 (2), e043971
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043971
Abstract
Objective The adherence to public health recommendations to control COVID-19 spread is influenced by public knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP). We performed this cross-sectional study to assess the levels and determinants of public KAP towards COVID-19 in a large, multinational sample. Design Cross-sectional study (survey). Setting The questionnaire was distributed to potential respondents via online platforms. Participants 71 890 individuals from 22 countries. Methods We formulated a four-section questionnaire in English, followed by validation and translation into seven languages. The questionnaire was distributed (May to June 2020) and each participant received a score for each KAP section. Results Overall, the participants had fair knowledge (mean score: 19.24±3.59) and attitudes (3.72±2.31) and good practices (12.12±1.83) regarding COVID-19. About 92% reported moderate to high compliance with national lockdown. However, significant gaps were observed: only 68.2% knew that infected individuals may be asymptomatic; 45.4% believed that antibiotics are an effective treatment; and 55.4% stated that a vaccine has been developed (at the time of data collection). 71.9% believed or were uncertain that COVID-19 is a global conspiracy; 36.8% and 51% were afraid of contacting doctors and Chinese people, respectively. Further, 66.4% reported the pandemic had moderate to high negative effects on their mental health. Female gender, higher education and urban residents had significantly (p≤0.001) higher knowledge and practice scores. Further, we observed significant correlations between all KAP scores. Conclusions Although the public have fair/good knowledge and practices regarding COVID-19, significant gaps should be addressed. Future awareness efforts should target less advantaged groups and future studies should develop new strategies to tackle COVID-19 negative mental health effects.Funding Information
- None
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in ChinaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019The New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- “Who knows more, and why?” Explaining socioeconomic-related inequality in knowledge about HIV in MalawiScientific African, 2019
- Socio-economic Inequality in Comprehensive Knowledge about HIV in MalawiMalawi Medical Journal, 2019
- Swine Flu: Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Survey of Medical and Dental Students of KarachiCureus, 2018
- Knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of hospital health-care workers regarding influenza A/H1N1: a cross sectional surveyBMC Infectious Diseases, 2014
- Estimating Design Effect and Calculating Sample Size for Respondent-Driven Sampling Studies of Injection Drug Users in the United StatesAIDS and Behavior, 2012
- Knowledge and Attitudes in Regard to Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) in a Multiethnic Community of MalaysiaInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2010
- Web-Based Network SamplingSociological Methods & Research, 2008
- Fear and Stigma: The Epidemic within the SARS OutbreakEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2004