The Reasonable Person Standard: Psychological and Legal Perspectives
- 13 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Law and Social Science
- Vol. 17 (1), 123-138
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-111620-020400
Abstract
In criminal cases of self-defense and provocation, and civil cases of negligence, culpability is often decided with reference to how a reasonably prudent person (RPP) would have behaved in similar circumstances. The RPP is said to be an objective standard in that it eschews consideration of a defendant's unique background or characteristics. We discuss theory and evidence suggesting that in morally relevant judgments, including those involving negligence, self-defense, and provocation, the tendency to rely on the self—on one's own values and predilections—dominates considerations of the RPP. We consider subjective standards that have been proposed as alternatives to the RPP and review research on this topic. We conclude by considering avenues for future research, particularly addressing conditions in which self-standards of reasonableness are most likely to prevail. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Volume 17 is October 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Moral Stereotypes of Liberals and Conservatives: Exaggeration of Differences across the Political SpectrumPLOS ONE, 2012
- Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision‐makingBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 2007
- Racial Bias in Mock Juror Decision-Making: A Meta-Analytic Review of Defendant Treatment.Law and Human Behavior, 2005
- Gender and role‐based perceptions of domestic abuse: does sexual orientation matter?Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2003
- The utility of the reasonable woman legal standard in hostile environment sexual harassment cases: A multimethod, multistudy examination.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1999
- Perceptions of sexual harassment: The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism.Law and Human Behavior, 1997
- Using Personal Attitudes to Judge Others: The Roles of Outcomes and ConsensusJournal of Research in Personality, 1996
- Social analytic investigation of hostile work environments: A test of the reasonable woman standard.Law and Human Behavior, 1995
- The Effects of Physical Attractiveness, Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Gender of Defendants and Victims on Judgments of Mock Jurors: A Meta‐Analysis1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1994
- Egocentric Standards of Conduct EvaluationBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 1993