Comparison of a 1064‐nm neodymium‐doped yttrium aluminum garnet picosecond laser using a diffractive optical element vs. a nonablative 1550‐nm erbium‐glass laser for the treatment of facial acne scarring in Asian patients: a 17‐week prospective, randomized, split‐face, controlled trial
- 30 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
- Vol. 34 (12), 2907-2913
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16643
Abstract
Background Novel picosecond lasers using a diffractive optical element (P‐DOE) have been available for skin resurfacing with distinct mechanisms. However, there are limited data directly comparing P‐DOE and conventional fractional lasers for the treatment of atrophic acne scarring. Objectives We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of a 1064‐nm neodymium‐doped yttrium aluminium garnet P‐DOE and a non‐ablative fractional laser (NAFL) in the treatment of acne scarring. Methods A prospective, randomized, split‐face, controlled trial was performed. One randomly assigned half‐side of each patient’s face (n = 25) was treated with four consecutive sessions of P‐DOE at 3‐week intervals and the other side with NAFL, with subsequent follow‐up for 8 weeks after the final sessions. The efficacy and safety of the two lasers were determined by the Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'acné (Scale of Clinical Evaluation of Acne Scars; ECCA) grading scale, Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score and patients’ reports at the final visit. Histologic analysis was also performed. Results The P‐DOE‐treated side achieved a significantly better improvement in acne appearance (ECCA per cent reduction: 55% vs. 42%) with less severe pain (4.3 vs. 5.6) (P < 0.05). The IGA score and subjective satisfaction were consistent with ECCA score results. Occurrences of treatment‐related side‐effects were also lower in the group treated with P‐DOE (P < 0.05). Histologic analysis revealed elongation and increased density of neocollagen fibres, elastic fibres and mucin throughout the dermis from both sides. Conclusions Compared with NAFL, P‐DOE afforded better clinical outcomes and fewer side‐effects in the treatment of acne scarring in Asian patients.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evolution of the Picosecond Laser: A Review of LiteratureDermatologic Surgery, 2019
- Combined Fractional Treatment of Acne Scars Involving Non-ablative 1,550-nm Erbium-glass Laser and Micro-needling Radiofrequency: A 16-week Prospective, Randomized Split-face StudyActa Dermato-Venereologica, 2017
- Fractional resurfacing in the Asian patient: Current state of the artLasers in Surgery and Medicine, 2016
- The histology of skin treated with a picosecond alexandrite laser and a fractional lens arrayLasers in Surgery and Medicine, 2016
- Use of a Picosecond Pulse Duration Laser With Specialized Optic for Treatment of Facial Acne ScarringJAMA Dermatology, 2015
- Minimally invasive non‐thermal laser technology using laser‐induced optical breakdown for skin rejuvenationJournal of Biophotonics, 2011
- Acne scars in ethnic skin treated with both non‐ablative fractional 1,550 nm and ablative fractional CO2 lasers: Comparative retrospective analysis with recommended guidelinesLasers in Surgery and Medicine, 2011
- New insights into the management of acne: An update from the Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in Acne GroupJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2009
- Laser resurfacing of the skin for the improvement of facial acne scarring: a systematic review of the evidenceBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2000
- Comparison of Responses of Tattoos to Picosecond and Nanosecond Q-Switched Neodymium:YAG LasersArchives of Dermatology, 1998