Confirmed COVID-19 Cases per Economic Activity during Autumn Wave in Belgium
Open Access
- 27 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 18 (23), 12489
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312489
Abstract
Some occupational sectors, such as human health and care, food service, cultural and sport activities, have been associated with a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection than other sectors. To curb the spread of SARS-CoV-2, it is preferable to apply targeted non-pharmaceutical interventions on selected economic sectors, rather than a full lockdown. However, the effect of these general and sector-specific interventions on the virus circulation has only been sparsely studied. We assess the COVID-19 incidence under different levels of non-pharmaceutical interventions per economic activity during the autumn 2020 wave in Belgium. The 14-day incidence of confirmed COVID-19 cases per the Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community (NACE–BEL) sector is modelled by a longitudinal Gaussian-Gaussian two-stage approach. This is based on exhaustive data on all employees in all sectors. In the presence of sanitary protocols and minimal non-pharmaceutical interventions, many sectors with close contact with others show considerably higher COVID-19 14-day incidences than other sectors. The effect of stricter non-pharmaceutical interventions in the general population and non-essential sectors is seen in the timing of the peak incidence and the width and height of the post-peak incidence. In most sectors incidences returned to higher levels after the peak than before and this decrease took longer for the health and care sector. Sanitary protocols for close proximity occupations may be sufficient during periods of low-level virus circulation, but progressively less with increasing circulation. Stricter general and sector-specific non-pharmaceutical interventions adequately decrease COVID-19 incidences, even in close proximity in essential sectors under solely sanitary protocols.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Professional football clubs and empirical evidence from the COVID-19 crisis: Time for sport entrepreneurship?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021
- Association of State-Issued Mask Mandates and Allowing On-Premises Restaurant Dining with County-Level COVID-19 Case and Death Growth Rates — United States, March 1–December 31, 2020Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 2021
- Mobility network models of COVID-19 explain inequities and inform reopeningNature, 2020
- Occupational risk of COVID-19 in the 1stvs 2ndwave of infectionPublished by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory ,2020
- Strong impact of closing schools, closing bars and wearing masks during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a simple and revealing analysisPublished by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory ,2020
- Occupational factors in the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: compensation claims applications support establishing an occupational surveillance systemOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2020
- Clusters of Coronavirus Disease in Communities, Japan, January–April 2020Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities Among COVID-19 Cases in Workplace Outbreaks by Industry Sector — Utah, March 6–June 5, 2020Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 2020
- Food System Workers are the Unexpected but Under Protected COVID HeroesJournal of Nutrition, 2020
- Meat plants—a new front line in the covid-19 pandemicBMJ, 2020