Athermal versus ultrasonic nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparison of functional and oncological outcomes
- 1 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in World Journal of Urology
- Vol. 39 (5), 1453-1462
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03351-4
Abstract
Purpose Many urologists emphasize the concept of heat-related damage suggesting the avoidance of any energy to perform nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. At our institution, both athermal and ultrasonic dissection have been used over the last years to perform a nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (NSLRP). In this study, we compare functional and oncological outcomes of the two procedures. Methods All charts from patients undergoing NSLRP between January 2009 and June 2015 were reviewed. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was recorded preoperatively and 3, 12 and 24 months after surgery; continence was recorded at 3 and 12 months; PSA was recorded at last follow-up. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association of variables with functional and oncological outcomes. Results Ultrasonic NSLRP was used for 120 patients, while athermal NSLRP on 111. The impact of the cutting technique on erection recovery was different at 3 months, favoring athermal dissection (p = 0.002); however, significance was lost at 12 (p = 0.09) and 24 (p = 0.14) months. Continence recovery was comparable at 3 (p = 0.1) and 12 (p = 0.2) months; the rate of positive surgical margins and PSA recurrence were also similar (p = 0.2 andp = 0.06, respectively). At univariate analysis, age, Gleason sum, nerve-sparing laterality, and extension (intra- vs interfascial) were associated with overall erection recovery; only age and nerve-sparing laterality were independent predictors. Age and preoperative TRUS prostate volume were associated with continence recovery, both at uni- and multivariate analysis. Conclusions The use of an ultrasonic device compared to athermal dissection during NSLRP does not affect long-term potency, nor continence and early biochemical recurrence.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are We Improving Erectile Function Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy? Analysis of Patients Treated over the Last DecadeEuropean Urology, 2018
- Long term patient satisfaction and quality of life with AMS700CX inflatable penile prosthesisArchivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia, 2013
- Best Practices in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus PanelEuropean Urology, 2012
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Potency Rates After Robot-assisted Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2012
- A Critical Analysis of the Long-Term Impact of Radical Prostatectomy on Cancer Control and Function OutcomesEuropean Urology, 2012
- A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy Related to Optimization of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2010
- Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomyUrology, 2006
- ENDOSCOPIC EXTRAPERITONEAL RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: ONCOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL RESULTS AFTER 700 PROCEDURESJournal of Urology, 2005
- 5-YEAR URINARY AND SEXUAL OUTCOMES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE PROSTATE CANCER OUTCOMES STUDYJournal of Urology, 2005
- Impotence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Insight Into Etiology and PreventionJournal of Urology, 1982