Flower Production, Headspace Volatiles, Pollen Nutrients, and Florivory in Tanacetum vulgare Chemotypes
Open Access
- 20 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Plant Science
Abstract
Floral volatiles and reward traits are major drivers for the behavior of mutualistic as well as antagonistic flower visitors, i.e., pollinators and florivores. These floral traits differ tremendously between species, but intraspecific differences and their consequences on organism interactions remain largely unknown. Floral volatile compounds, such as terpenoids, function as cues to advertise rewards to pollinators, but should at the same time also repel florivores. The reward composition, e.g., protein and lipid contents in pollen, differs between individuals of distinct plant families. Whether the nutritional value of rewards within the same plant species is linked to their chemotypes, which differ in their pattern of specialized metabolites, has yet not been investigated. In the present study, we compared Tanacetum vulgare plants of five terpenoid chemotypes with regard to flower production, floral headspace volatiles, pollen macronutrient and terpenoid content, and floral attractiveness to florivorous beetles. Our analyses revealed remarkable differences between the chemotypes in the amount and diameter of flower heads, duration of bloom period, and pollen nutritional quality. The floral headspace composition of pollen-producing mature flowers, but not of premature flowers, was correlated to that of pollen and leaves in the same plant individual. For two chemotypes, florivorous beetles discriminated between the scent of mature and premature flower heads and preferred the latter. In semi-field experiments, the abundance of florivorous beetles and flower tissue miners differed between T. vulgare chemotypes. Moreover, the scent environment affected the choice and beetles were more abundant in homogenous plots composed of one single chemotype than in plots with different neighboring chemotypes. In conclusion, flower production, floral metabolic composition and pollen quality varied to a remarkable extend within the species T. vulgare, and the attractiveness of floral scent differed also intra-individually with floral ontogeny. We found evidence for a trade-off between pollen lipid content and pollen amount on a per-plant-level. Our study highlights that chemotypes which are more susceptible to florivory are less attacked when they grow in the neighborhood of other chemotypes and thus gain a benefit from high overall chemodiversity.Funding Information
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EI 1164/1-1)
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic and chemical variation of Tanacetum vulgare in plants of native and invasive originBiological Control, 2012
- The major volatile organic compound emitted from Arabidopsis thaliana flowers, the sesquiterpene (E)‐β‐caryophyllene, is a defense against a bacterial pathogenNew Phytologist, 2011
- Intraspecific plant chemical diversity and its relation to herbivoryOecologia, 2010
- Floral scents repel facultative flower visitors, but attract obligate onesAnnals of Botany, 2010
- Diversity and Distribution of Floral ScentThe Botanical Review, 2006
- Spatial fragrance patterns in flowers of Silene latifolia: Lilac compounds as olfactory nectar guides?Österreichische botanische Zeitschrift, 2005
- Ant-aphid mutualisms: the impact of honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition on ant preferencesOecologia, 1999
- Spatial fragrance patterns within the flowers ofRanunculus acris (Ranunculaceae)Österreichische botanische Zeitschrift, 1995
- Floral volatiles ofTanacetum vulgare L. attractive toLobesia botrana den. et schiff. femalesJournal of Chemical Ecology, 1992
- A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye bindingAnalytical Biochemistry, 1976