Evaluating the effect of nurse-initiated discussion of infection management during ICU bedside rounds
Open Access
- 2 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Open Quality
- Vol. 9 (4), e001037
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001037
Abstract
Intensive care unit (ICU) antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions generally do not include nurses although their role is increasingly recognised.1–4 Previous literature described inclusion of nurses and nurse-led AMS interventions outside of ICU daily bedside rounds.5 6 After using a structured quality improvement (QI) evaluation of the daily bedside rounding model of the ICU clinical team we hypothesised the addition of ‘infection’ as an entity in the ICU nurses’ structured daily report would improve interprofessional discussion of infection management.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nurse Prompting for Prescriber-Led Review of Antimicrobial Use in the Critical Care UnitAmerican Journal of Critical Care, 2020
- Clinical Nurse Preparation and Partnership in Antibiotic Stewardship ProgramsJONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 2019
- Long-Term Effects of Phased Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Academic ICUs: 2007–2015*Critical Care Medicine, 2019
- Engaging Nurses in Optimizing Antimicrobial Use in ICUsJournal of Nursing Care Quality, 2018
- Outcomes of Bedside Nurse-Driven Interdisciplinary Antibiotic Stewardship and Infection Prevention RoundsOpen Forum Infectious Diseases, 2017
- Use of a structured panel process to define antimicrobial prescribing appropriateness in critical careJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2017
- Multidisciplinary in-hospital teams improve patient outcomes: A reviewSurgical Neurology International, 2014
- The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventionsImplementation Science, 2011