Qualitative and quantitative approach to assess of the potential for automating administrative tasks in general practice
Open Access
- 8 June 2020
- Vol. 10 (6), e032412
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032412
Abstract
Objective To identify the extent to which administrative tasks carried out by primary care staff in general practice could be automated. Design A mixed-method design including ethnographic case studies, focus groups, interviews and an online survey of automation experts. Setting Three urban and three rural general practice health centres in England selected for differences in list size and organisational characteristics. Participants Observation and interviews with 65 primary care staff in the following job roles: administrator, manager, general practitioner, healthcare assistant, nurse practitioner, pharmacy technician, phlebotomist, practice nurse, pharmacist, prescription clerk, receptionist, scanning clerk, secretary and medical summariser; together with a survey of 156 experts in automation technologies. Methods 330 hours of ethnographic observation and documentation of administrative tasks carried out by staff in each of the above job roles, followed by coding and classification; semistructured interviews with 10 general practitioners and 6 staff focus groups. The online survey of machine learning, artificial intelligence and robotics experts was analysed using an ordinal Gaussian process prediction model to estimate the automatability of the observed tasks. Results The model predicted that roughly 44% of administrative tasks carried out by staff in general practice are ‘mostly’ or ‘completely’ automatable using currently available technology. Discussions with practice staff underlined the need for a cautious approach to implementation. Conclusions There is considerable potential to extend the use of automation in primary care, but this will require careful implementation and ongoing evaluation.Funding Information
- The Health Foundation (7559)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cooperative Epistemic Work in Medical Practice: An Analysis of Physicians’ Clinical NotesComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2016
- Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14The Lancet, 2016
- Tackling the crisis in general practiceBMJ, 2016
- Validating free-text order entry for a note-centric EHR.2015
- Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and OffshoringAmerican Economic Review, 2014
- Putting Tasks to the Test: Human Capital, Job Tasks, and WagesJournal of Labor Economics, 2013
- Dynamic Bayesian Combination of Multiple Imperfect ClassifiersPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2013
- Fostering and Evaluating Reflective Capacity in Medical Education: Developing the REFLECT Rubric for Assessing Reflective WritingAcademic Medicine, 2012
- Receptionist input to quality and safety in repeat prescribing in UK general practice: ethnographic case studyBMJ, 2011
- An intelligent listening framework for capturing encounter notes from a doctor-patient dialogBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2009