Comment on ‘On the relationship between Atlantic meridional overturning circulation slowdown and global surface warming’
Open Access
- 26 February 2021
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by IOP Publishing in Environmental Research Letters
- Vol. 16 (3), 038001
- https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc775
Abstract
The recent Environmental Research Letters article by Caesar, Rahmstorf and Feulner (hereafter CRF) is essentially a Comment on our Nature paper (Chen and Tung 2018 Nature 559 387–91), but without an accompanying rebuttal from us. In this unusual format for the exchange outside Nature, our rebuttal then becomes a Comment here at Environmental Research Letters. Our original proposal that the rate of global warming is enhanced by a weak Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) remains valid and is strengthened with this exchange. CRF used “established evidence” to argue against our finding, but such evidence is either misapplied (i.e. applying model results from preindustrial control runs with constant greenhouse gasses to the industrial era with increasing greenhouse gasses), or misinterpreted (i.e. climate model results for the industrial era specifically for the trends interpreted as for the AMOC cycles). While we used the observed energy budget to show that a strong (weak) AMOC transports more (less) heat to below 200 m, CRF replaces the actual budget with a simple energy-balance equation. They used an inappropriate equilibrium approximation to their simple equation to argue that global mean surface temperature (GMST) and AMOC should be in phase. We show here that the exact solution to that same equation actually supports our claim on the relationship between the rate of change of GMST and the AMOC state, which they misunderstood as we claiming a negative correlation between GMST and AMOC themselves. They claimed, incorrectly, that a positive correlation coefficient, no matter how small and even though none of them is statistically significant, is strong evidence that the two time series are in phase. The correlation coefficients that they found using observational data (0.01, 0.28 and 0.45), though positive, correspond to 89 ∘ , 74 ∘ , 63 ∘ out of phase, far from being in-phase. Visually they were made to look somewhat in-phase with decadal smoothing and short-period detrending. Both model and observational evidence supports the conclusion of our original paper that the period of AMOC minimum is a period of rapid rate of surface warming.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vertical Heat Transport by Ocean Circulation and the Role of Mechanical and Haline ForcingJournal of Physical Oceanography, 2013
- Influence of Continental Ice Retreat on Future Global ClimateJournal of Climate, 2013
- Northern High-Latitude Heat Budget Decomposition and Transient WarmingJournal of Climate, 2013
- Deducing Multidecadal Anthropogenic Global Warming Trends Using Multiple Regression AnalysisJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2013
- Effect of the potential melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet on the Meridional Overturning Circulation and global climate in the futureDeep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 2011
- On the time-varying trend in global-mean surface temperatureClimate Dynamics, 2011
- A New Algorithm for Finding Mixed Layer Depths with Applications to Argo Data and Subantarctic Mode Water Formation*Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2009
- Coherent surface‐subsurface fingerprint of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulationGeophysical Research Letters, 2008
- On the trend, detrending, and variability of nonlinear and nonstationary time seriesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- A signature of persistent natural thermohaline circulation cycles in observed climateGeophysical Research Letters, 2005