Modeling: ratio between means of teaching and motor training in junior school physical education classes
Open Access
- 26 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Sergii Iermakov in Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports
- Vol. 25 (3), 194-201
- https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2021.0308
Abstract
Background and Study Aim. The purpose of the study was to determine the ratio between means of teaching and motor training in junior school physical education classes. Materials and methods. The study involved 32 boys who were 8 years old at the beginning of the experiment. They were randomly divided into four groups of eight people each. A pedagogical experiment was conducted using a 22 full factorial design. The study recorded the following indicators: number of repetitions required to teach exercises; grade for a unidirectional movement coordination exercise (test 1); grade for a multidirectional movement coordination exercise (test 2); error in time accuracy of performing the squat thrust (test 3); error in time accuracy of 5 jumps on marks in 5 s (test 4); error in assessing muscular effort with visual control (test 5); vestibular stability, error (test 6). The obtained experimental material was processed statistically using statistical analysis software packages (SPSS 20). Results. According to the logistic function analysis, the achievement of an optimal result in differentiating temporal characteristics of movement requires 8.5 months, strength characteristics of movement – 8 months, movement coordination – 8 months, vestibular analyzer stability – 10 months. It takes 3 to 5 months to obtain positive increases in testing results in boys aged 8-9. The ratio of time allotted for strength training (ST) and coordination training (CT) to teaching motor actions (TMA) varies as 1:4 (ST: TMA) and 1:4.5 (CT: TMA). Conclusions. The ratio of time allotted for strength training, coordination training, and teaching to the time of the main part of the class ranges between 14.3-23.5% (strength training), 17.1-23.5% (coordination training), and 53.0-68.6% (teaching). As exercises become more complicated, the time allotted for strength and coordination training increases.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Control and Assessment of 7-Year-Old Boys’ Coordination Abilities at the Initial Training Stage in Kyokushin KarateJournal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 2020
- Motor Skills: Motor Fitness Structure of 9-Year-Old BoysJournal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 2020
- Impact of a physical education-based behavioural skill training program on cognitive antecedents and exercise and sport behaviour among adolescents: a cluster-randomized controlled trialPhysical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2020
- Motor Skills in the Structure of Physical Fitness of 7-Year-Old BoysJournal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 2020
- Cooperative learning in physical education: a study of students’ learning journey over 24 lessonsPhysical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2020
- Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five YearsResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2020
- Innovative Analysis of Service-Learning Effects in Physical Education: A Mixed-Methods ApproachJournal of Teaching in Physical Education, 2020
- Grading in Portuguese secondary school physical education: assessment parameters, gender differences and associations with academic achievementPhysical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2019
- Einfluss der Koordination auf das Lernen einer großmotorischen AufgabeGerman Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 2019
- Impact of cultural background on fundamental movement skill and its correlatesJournal of Sports Sciences, 2018