Pains and Gains of Peer-Reviewing in Software Engineering (4)
- 29 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
- Vol. 46 (1), 8
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3437479.3437480
Abstract
The "Pains and Gains of Peer-Reviewing in Software Engineering" column of SEN aims at fostering a constructive and stimulating discussion on peer-reviewing in software engineering venues. This fourth editorial introduces a new contribution to the column, which reports on the recently released ACM SIGSOFT Empirical Standards for evaluating specific kinds of studies.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peer Reviewing in Software EngineeringACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2020
- Peer ReviewACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2020
- Double-blind is good but open would be betterACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2020
- The ACM SIGSOFT Paper and Peer Review Quality InitiativeACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2020
- Pains and Gains of Peer-Reviewing in Software EngineeringACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2020