Amplifying Voice in Organizations
- 1 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Academy of Management in The Academy of Management Journal
- Vol. 64 (4), 1288-1312
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0621
Abstract
We extend the field’s understanding of voice recognition by examining peer responses to voice. We investigate how employees can help peers get a status boost from voicing, while also raising their own status, by introducing the concept of amplification—public endorsement of another person’s contribution, with attribution to that person. In two experiments and one field study, we find that amplification enhances status both for voicers and for those who amplify voice. Being amplified was equally beneficial for voicers who framed their ideas promotively (improvement-focused) and prohibitively (problem-focused; Study 1), and for men and women (Study 2). Furthermore, amplified ideas were rated as higher quality than nonamplified ideas. In an intervention in a nonprofit organization, select employees trained to use amplification attained higher status in their work groups (Study 3). Amplification also helped amplifiers: participants reading experimentally manipulated meeting transcripts rated amplifiers as higher status than those who self-promoted, stayed quiet, or contributed additional ideas (Studies 1 and 2). In all, these results increase our understanding of how social actors can capitalize on instances of voice to give a status boost to voicers who might otherwise be overlooked, and help organizations realize the potential of employees’ diverse perspectives.Keywords
This publication has 107 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave ExaminationThe Academy of Management Journal, 2012
- The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizationsResearch in Organizational Behavior, 2011
- Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future ResearchAcademy of Management Annals, 2011
- Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009
- Consensus and the Creation of Status BeliefsSocial Forces, 2006
- Helping one's way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006
- No Credit Where Credit Is Due: Attributional Rationalization of Women's Success in Male-Female Teams.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005
- Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001
- Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997
- Generative Processes of ComprehensionEducational Psychologist, 1989