Who do you choose? Comparing perceptions of human vs robo-advisor in the context of financial services
- 3 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Journal of Services Marketing
- Vol. 35 (5), 634-646
- https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-05-2020-0162
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the differences in consumers’ perceptions of trust, performance expectancy and intention to hire between human financial advisors with high/low expertise and robo-advisors. Three experiments were conducted. The respondents were randomly assigned to human advisors with high/low expertise or a robo-advisor. Data were analyzed using MANCOVA. The results suggest that consumers prefer human financial advisors with high expertise to robo-advisors. There are no significant differences between robo-advisors and novice financial advisors regarding performance expectancy and intention to hire. This pioneering study extends the self-service technology adoption theory to examine adoption of robo-advisors vs human financial advisors with different expertise levels. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is among the first studies to address multi-dimensionality of trust in the context of artificial intelligence-based self-service technologies.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehiclesTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2013
- Customer choice of self‐service technology: the roles of situational influences and past experienceJournal of Service Management, 2012
- The Influences of Message and Source Factors on Advice OutcomesCommunication Research, 2010
- Dimensionality of Risk Perception: Factors Affecting Consumer Understanding and Evaluation of Financial RiskJournal of Behavioral Finance, 2009
- Tailor-made single-item measures of doubly concrete constructsInternational Journal of Advertising, 2009
- Understanding how technology paradoxes affect customer satisfaction with self‐service technology: The role of performance ambiguity and trust in technologyPsychology & Marketing, 2008
- Consumer Trust and Advice Acceptance: The Moderating Roles of Benevolence, Expertise, and Negative EmotionsJournal of Consumer Psychology, 2005
- Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate RelianceHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2004
- Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service qualityInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 1996
- "The stability of behavior: II. Implications for psychological research": Reply to Lieberman.American Psychologist, 1981