Benefits and Risks of Iron Interventions in Infants in Bangladesh
- 2 December 2021
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 385 (23), 2198-2199
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc2116125
Abstract
To the Editor: The randomized, placebo-controlled trial Benefits and Risks of Iron Interventions in Young Children (BRISC) (September 9 issue)1 showed that 3 months of iron supplementation in infants reduced the prevalence of anemia but did not improve infant development. Although the daily supplementation with 12.5 mg of elemental iron was consonant with guidelines from the World Health Organization, the increased rates of iron deficiency and anemia seemed higher in the infants who received iron than in those who received placebo, both before and after the subsequent iron-free follow-up period. Table 2 and Table S2 in the Supplementary Appendix indicated . . .Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Benefits and Risks of Iron Interventions in Infants in Rural BangladeshThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2021
- Fecal Colonization With Multidrug-Resistant E. coli Among Healthy Infants in Rural BangladeshFrontiers in Microbiology, 2019
- Oral iron acutely elevates bacterial growth in human serumScientific Reports, 2015
- Iron fortification adversely affects the gut microbiome, increases pathogen abundance and induces intestinal inflammation in Kenyan infantsGut, 2014
- Effect of daily iron supplementation on health in children aged 4–23 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsThe Lancet. Global Health, 2013
- Hepcidin, a key regulator of iron metabolism and mediator of anemia of inflammationBlood, 2003