Can citizen pressure influence politicians’ communication about climate change? Results from a field experiment
- 16 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Climatic Change
- Vol. 168 (1-2), 1-20
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03215-9
Abstract
Urgent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions depend on governments implementing and enforcing rigorous climate policy. Individuals in democracies seeking to persuade government officials to reduce greenhouse gas emissions can take steps such as voting, protesting, and contacting officials directly, but it is unclear how effective each of these actions is in changing the behavior of elected officials. Here we take advantage of the public nature of social media to evaluate the actual efficacy of climate campaign emails using an original, real-world experiment where 335 Members of Canadian Parliament were asked by constituents to post a pro-climate message to their Twitter account. Only one Member of Parliament posted the exact text suggested by the campaign. After scraping and coding 18,776 tweets, we first find no evidence that a public health messaging frame is more effective than a standard environmental frame in eliciting pro-climate posts. Furthermore, we find only a marginally significant relationship between volume of constituent contact and increased pro-climate tweeting from Members of Parliament. Follow-up interviews with political staffers suggest that analog alternatives may be more effective than campaign emails in some cases. Interview findings also reveal that some offices receive low levels of constituent communication on climate change, indicating that increased pressure from constituents could still be consequential.This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum?Public Opinion Quarterly, 2013
- A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate changeClimatic Change, 2012
- Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010Climatic Change, 2012
- Who Listens to the Grass Roots? A Field Experiment on Informational Lobbying in the UKThe British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2012
- Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State LegislatorsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2011
- Intention-to-treat concept: A reviewPerspectives in Clinical Research, 2011
- Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactionsBMC Public Health, 2010
- Reorienting Climate Change Communication for Effective MitigationScience Communication, 2009
- The Short List: The Most Effective Actions U.S. Households Can Take to Curb Climate ChangeEnvironment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 2008
- Dynamics of Congressional Loyalty: Party Defection and Roll-Call Behavior, 1947-97Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2000