Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of Subacromial spacer for Tears Affecting Rotator cuff Tendons: a Randomised, Efficient, Adaptive Clinical Trial in Surgery (START:REACTS)
Open Access
- 1 May 2020
- Vol. 10 (5), e036829
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036829
Abstract
Introduction Shoulder pain due to irreparable rotator cuff tears can cause substantial disability, but treatment options are limited. A balloon spacer is a relatively simple addition to a standard arthroscopic debridement procedure, but it is costly and there is no current randomised trial evidence to support its use. This trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a subacromial balloon spacer for individuals undergoing arthroscopic debridement for irreparable rotator cuff tears. New surgical procedures can provide substantial benefit to patients. Good quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are needed, but trials in surgery are typically long and expensive, exposing patients to risk and the healthcare system to substantial costs. One way to improve the efficiency of trials is with an adaptive sample size. Such methods are well established in drug trials but have rarely, if ever, been used in surgical trials. Methods and analysis Subacromial spacer for Tears Affecting Rotator cuff Tendons: a Randomised, Efficient, Adaptive Clinical Trial in Surgery (START:REACTS) is a participant and assessor blinded, adaptive, multicentre RCT comparing arthroscopic debridernent with the InSpace balloon (Stryker, USA) to arthroscopic debridement alone for people with a symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tear. It uses a group sequential adaptive design where interim analyses are performed using all of the 3, 6 and 12-month data that are available at each time point. A maximum of 221 participants will be randomised (1:1 ratio), this will provide 90% power (at the 5% level) for a 6 point difference in the primary outcome; the Oxford Shoulder Score at 12 months. A substudy will use deltoid-active MRI scans in 56 participants to assess the function of the balloon. Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis and reported according to principles established in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. Ethics and dissemination NRES number 18/WM/0025. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, presentations at conferences, lay summaries and social media.Funding Information
- Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme (16/61/18)
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2013
- Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country studyQuality of Life Research, 2012
- New Solution for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: The Subacromial “Biodegradable Spacer”Arthroscopy Techniques, 2012
- Adaptive trial designs: a review of barriers and opportunitiesTrials, 2012
- Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2012
- Costs of shoulder pain and resource use in primary health care: a cost-of-illness study in SwedenBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2012
- Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: a consensus studyBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Developing appropriate methodology for the study of surgical techniquesJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2009
- Deficits in shoulder function and general health associated with sixteen common shoulder diagnoses: A study of 2674 patientsJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2006
- Radiological Assessment of Osteo-ArthrosisAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 1957