Four Surgical Strategies for the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Defect: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
- 4 November 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
- Vol. 27 (3), 593-602
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.027
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparative Study of Transvaginal Repair and Laparoscopic Repair in the Management of Patients With Previous Cesarean Scar DefectJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2016
- WHO Statement on caesarean section ratesReproductive Health Matters, 2015
- Clinical diagnosis and therapy of uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant womenArchiv für Gynäkologie, 2014
- A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysisBMJ, 2014
- Pulmonary blastoma: a case report and review of the literatureBMC Research Notes, 2014
- A Comparison of Vaginal Surgery and Operative Hysteroscopy for the Treatment of Cesarean-Induced Isthmocele: A Retrospective ReviewGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 2014
- The definition, aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and management of previous caesarean scar defectsJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2013
- A retrospective case–control study comparing hysteroscopic resection versus hormonal modulation in treating menstrual disorders due to isthmoceleGynecological Endocrinology, 2010
- Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2010
- Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: Power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literatureJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2000