Costs and outcomes of active and passive case detection for visceral leishmaniasis (Kala-Azar) to inform elimination strategies in Bihar, India

Abstract

Effective case identification strategies are fundamental to capturing the remaining visceral leishmaniasis (VL) cases in India. To inform government strategies to reach and sustain elimination benchmarks, this study presents costs of active- and passive- case detection (ACD and PCD) strategies used in India’s most VL-endemic state, Bihar, with a focus on programme outcomes stratified by district-level incidence. Expenditure analysis was complemented by onsite micro-costing to compare the cost of PCD in hospitals alongside index case-based ACD and a combination of blanket (house-to-house) and camp ACD from January to December 2018. From the provider’s perspective, a cost analysis evaluated the overall programme cost of each activity, the cost per case detected, and the cost of scaling up ACD. During 2018, index case-based ACD, blanket and camp ACD, and PCD reported 1,497, 131, and 1,983 VL-positive cases at a unit cost of $522.81, $4,186.81, and $246.79, respectively. In high endemic districts, more VL cases were identified through PCD while in meso- and low-endemic districts more cases were identified through ACD. The cost of scaling up ACD to identify 3,000 additional cases ranged from $1.6–4 million, depending on the extent to which blanket and camp ACD was relied upon. Cost per VL test conducted (rather than VL-positive case identified) may be a better metric estimating unit costs to scale up ACD in Bihar. As more VL cases were identified in meso-and low-endemic districts through ACD than PCD, health authorities in India should consider bolstering ACD in these areas. Blanket and camp ACD identified fewer cases at a higher unit cost than index case-based ACD. However, the value of detecting additional VL cases early outweighs long-term costs for reaching and sustaining VL elimination benchmarks in India. Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is targeted for elimination in India by 2020, where early identification and prompt treatment are essential measures for reaching and sustaining incidence benchmarks. Both active- and passive- case detection (ACD and PCD) strategies have been employed in recent years, and evaluating the cost and outputs of each is now important for sustaining funding and political momentum. This study presents overall and unit costs for PCD, index case-based ACD (where neighbours in the vicinity of a recent VL case are screened), and a combination of blanket and camp ACD (involving house-to-house case searching and weekly diagnostic camps) in Bihar, India during 2018. Results of this study indicate that a larger proportion of VL cases were found through PCD in high incidence districts, which may be related to increased interaction with ACD officers. ACD can be bolstered in meso- and low-incidence districts where educational exposure to VL is low and risk of resurgence is high. Although blanket and camp ACD unit costs were at least four times higher than index case-based ACD, the number of VL cases identified through this approach may warrant the investment to achieve VL elimination. Cost and outcomes of VL case finding approaches need to be continuously evaluated until elimination benchmarks are reached and integrated into sustained surveillance programmes.