Normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel Michigan program
Open Access
- 23 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 20 (1), 1-9
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05550-6
Abstract
In 2015, Michigan implemented a rule requiring parents to attend an education session at a local health department (LHD) prior to waiving mandatory child vaccinations. This study utilizes Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to assess program implementation, identifying potential threats to fidelity and sustainability. We conducted 32 semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in these education programs across 16 LHDs. Participating LHDs were selected from a stratified, representative sample. One interviewer conducted all interviews using a semi-structured interview guide; two authors coded and analyzed the interview transcripts according to the NPT framework (i.e, sense-making, engagement, collective action, and reflexive monitoring). There was a lack of consensus about who the stakeholders of this new rule and its resulting program were (sense-making). Perhaps as a result, most LHDs did not solicit advice from key stakeholder groups (i.e., schools, health care providers, community stakeholders) in their planning (engagement). While most interviewees identified providing education and information as the goal, some identified the more challenging goal of persuading vaccine hesitant parents to immunize their children. There was also some variation in perception of who held health educators accountable for meeting the goals of the waiver education program (collective action). Formal program evaluation by LHDs was rare, although some held informal staff debriefings. Additionally, sessions that went particularly well or poorly were top-of-mind (reflexive monitoring). The immunization waiver education program may be at risk of not becoming fully embedded into routine LHD practice, potentially compromising its long-term effectiveness and sustainability. Managers at the local and state level should maintain oversight to ensure that the program is delivered with fidelity. As the program relies on sustaining inconvenience to encourage parents to immunize their children, any shortcuts taken will undermine its success.Keywords
Funding Information
- Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan (n/a)
- Health Resources and Services Administration (T32 HP30035)
- National Institute of Mental Health (5T32MH019733-25)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processesImplementation Science, 2014
- Vaccination Policies and Rates of Exemption from Immunization, 2005–2011New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research AgendaAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2010
- Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventionsBMC Medicine, 2010
- Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process TheorySociology, 2009
- Arduous implementation: Does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practiceImplementation Science, 2008
- Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy ImplementationJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2007
- Nonmedical Exemptions to School Immunization RequirementsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2006
- Three Approaches to Qualitative Content AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 2005
- Children Who Have Received No Vaccines: Who Are They and Where Do They Live?PEDIATRICS, 2004