The role of UK national ligament registry as additional source of evidence for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Review of the literature and future Perspectives
Open Access
- 1 January 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Heighten Science Publications Corporation in Journal of Sports Medicine and Therapy
- Vol. 2 (3), 081-090
- https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jsmt.1001012
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated ReviewPLOS ONE, 2013
- Treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tear: five year outcome of randomised trialBMJ, 2013
- Clinical Research Involving Children: Registration, Completeness, and PublicationPEDIATRICS, 2012
- Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison with non-operative treatment with a follow-up of 17–20 yearsInternational Orthopaedics, 2011
- Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialistsBMJ, 2011
- Reconstructive versus non-reconstructive treatment of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. A retrospective matched-pair long-term follow-upInternational Orthopaedics, 2010
- A Randomized Trial of Treatment for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent EfficacyThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- A 10-Year Prospective Trial of a Patient Management Algorithm and Screening Examination for Highly Active Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2007
- Current practice in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the United KingdomBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004