Age in the Time of COVID-19: An Ethical Analysis
Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Aging and Disease in Aging and disease
- Vol. 12 (1), 7-13
- https://doi.org/10.14336/ad.2020.0929
Abstract
Despite using a myriad of methods to combat the spread of COVID-19, the healthcare systems (especially the intensive care units) have been overwhelmed, showing an outpaced capacity of available beds and ventilators. Choosing the right criteria to allocate the scarce ICU seems very challenging, being necessary a rapid, uncomplicated and universally accepted tool for patients' triage regarding access to lifesaving resources; one such criterion, which generates intense debates, is age. Under certain circumstances, it might seem appropriate to choose to treat a young over an old patient. The main advantage of this approach is the potential for long-term survival, implying an equal right to reach an advanced age. Many authors have given moral reasons to support it, mainly based on utilitarian ethics or on distributive justice. However, there are numerous counterarguments to this approach, which we will summarize in this article. We will show that age should never be used as a unique criterion for withholding/not initiating life-saving procedures, even in pandemics or cases in which healthcare resources are extremely scarce. This approach is based on fundamental Codes of Ethics, such as the WMA Code of Ethics or the Oath of Hippocrates and all physicians treating patients should obey them.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should we relax the definition of death or the dead donor rule?Intensive Care Medicine, 2014
- Elderly and Older Racial/Ethnic Minority Healthcare InequalitiesCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2012
- Death Revisited: Rethinking Death and the Dead Donor RuleJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2010
- Ageism: Prejudice Against Our Feared Future SelfJournal of Social Issues, 2005
- The economics of ageing: on the attitude of Swedish people to the distribution of health care resources between the young and the oldHealth Policy, 1996
- Health care rationing: the public's debateBMJ, 1996
- Should Health Care be Rationed by Age?Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 1995
- Public Attitudes About the Use of Chronological Age as a Criterion for Allocating Health Care ResourcesThe Gerontologist, 1993
- Selecting patients when resources are limited: a study of US medical directors of kidney dialysis and transplantation facilities.American Journal of Public Health, 1988
- Ageism: A ForewordJournal of Social Issues, 1980