Cost-utility analysis of curative and maintenance repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: a randomized controlled trial protocol
Open Access
- 5 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Trials
- Vol. 21 (1), 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04255-9
Abstract
Background Depression is a debilitating and costly disease for our society, especially in the case of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective adjuvant therapy in treatment-resistant unipolar and non-psychotic depression. It can be applied according to two therapeutic strategies after an initial rTMS cure: a further rTMS cure can be performed at the first sign of relapse or recurrence, or systematic maintenance rTMS (M-rTMS) can be proposed. TMS adjuvant to treatment as usual (TAU) could improve long-term prognosis. However, no controlled study has yet compared the cost-effectiveness of these two additional rTMS therapeutic strategies versus TAU alone. Methods/design This paper focuses on the design of a health-economic, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study with three parallel arms carried out in France. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of the adjunctive and maintenance low frequency rTMS on the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex versus TAU alone. A total of 318 patients suffering from a current TRD will be enrolled. The primary endpoint is to investigate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (ratio costs / quality-adjusted life-years [QALY] measured by the Euroqol Five Dimension Questionnaire) over 12 months in a population of patients assigned to one of three arms: systematic M-rTMS for responders (arm A); additional new rTMS cure in case of mood deterioration among responders (arm B); and a placebo arm (arm C) in which responders are allocated in two subgroups: sham systematic M-rTMS and supplementary rTMS course in case of mood deterioration. ICER and QALYs will be compared between arm A or B versus arm C. The secondary endpoints in each three arms will be: ICER at 24 months; the cost-utility ratio analysis at 12 and 24 months; 5-year budget impact analysis; and prognosis factors of rTMS. The following criteria will be compared between arm A or B and arm C: rates of responders; remission and disease-free survival; clinical evolution; tolerance; observance; treatment modifications; hospitalization; suicide attempts; work stoppage; marital / professional statues; and quality of life at 12 and 24 months. Discussion The purpose of our study is to check the cost-effectiveness of rTMS and we will discuss its economic impact over time. In the case of significant decrease in the depression costs and expenditures associated with a good long-term prognosis (sustained response and remission) and tolerance, rTMS could be considered as an efficient treatment within the armamentarium for resistant unipolar depression.Funding Information
- Direction Générale de l’offre de Soins (PRME-17-0236)
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Burden of Depressive Disorders by Country, Sex, Age, and Year: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010PLoS Medicine, 2013
- Transcranial direct current stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in consultation-liaison psychiatryBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 2013
- rTMS for pharmacoresistant major depression in the clinical setting of a psychiatric hospital: Effectiveness and effects of ageJournal of Affective Disorders, 2013
- High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Accelerates and Enhances the Clinical Response to Antidepressants in Major DepressionBritish Journal of Psychology, 2013
- Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Clinical Practice Post-FDA Approval in the United StatesBritish Journal of Psychology, 2012
- Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010European Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011
- Sample Size and Power for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (Part 1)PharmacoEconomics, 2011
- EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol GroupAnnals of Medicine, 2001
- The Validity and Reproducibility of a Work Productivity and Activity Impairment InstrumentPharmacoEconomics, 1993
- A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to ChangeThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1979