Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Plagiarism as Reported by Participants Completing the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing
- 17 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Science and Engineering Ethics
- Vol. 26 (2), 1067-1088
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00198-1
Abstract
To explore the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding plagiarism in a large culturally diverse sample of researchers who participated in the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing. An online survey was designed and delivered through Google Forms to the participants in the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing during April to June 2017. A total of 765 participants completed the survey (response rate 47.8%), and 746 responses were included in the analysis. Almost all participants (97.6%) reported knowledge of the term “plagiarism”, and 89.1% of them understand the meaning of the term before joining the course. Most participants reported that their university does not provide access to plagiarism detection software (82.0%), and 35% participants admitted they had been involved in plagiarism during their education. Overall attitudes toward plagiarism (65.3 ± 10.93) indicated low acceptance of plagiarism. Moreover, low scores were reported for approval attitude (25.22 ± 5.63), disapproval attitude (11.78 ± 3.64), and knowledge of subjective norms (20.63 ± 5.22). The most common reason for plagiarizing was lack of time (16.1%), and the most common consequence was the perception that “those who plagiarize are not respected or seen positively” (71.4%). Developing country researchers appear to be familiar with the concept of plagiarism, but knowledge among the participants surveyed here was incomplete. Knowledge about plagiarism and awareness of its harmfulness must be improved, because there is an obvious relationship between attitudes toward plagiarism and knowledge, reasons and consequences. The use of plagiarism-detection software can raise awareness about plagiarism.This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?PLOS ONE, 2013
- Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income CountriesPLoS Medicine, 2013
- Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publicationsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012
- Perspective: Publication Ethics and the Emerging Scientific Workforce: Understanding “Plagiarism” in a Global ContextAcademic Medicine, 2012
- Plagiarism in scientific writing: words or ideas?Croatian Medical Journal, 2011
- International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international traineesUrologic Oncology, 2011
- RESEARCH INTEGRITY IN CHINA: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTSDeveloping World Bioethics, 2010
- Construction and Validation of Attitudes Toward Plagiarism QuestionnaireCroatian Medical Journal, 2010
- The tangled web: investigating academics’ views of plagiarism at the University of Cape TownStudies in Higher Education, 2010
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey DataPLOS ONE, 2009